Comparison of debris-flow volumes from burned and unburned areas

被引:0
|
作者
Paul M. Santi
Luca Morandi
机构
[1] Colorado School of Mines,Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
来源
Landslides | 2013年 / 10卷
关键词
Debris flow; Magnitude; Yield rate; Wildfire; Recovery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goals of this work are to show the range of debris-flow volumes and watershed characteristics for several locations, and the differences in flow volumes for events triggered soon after wildfire. A dataset of 929 events was divided into groups based on location and burn status. The three unburned locations show significant differences: debris flows from the Italian Alps are larger and generate more debris per unit basin area or unit channel length than flows in the Western USA or in the Pacific Northwest. However, some of the observed differences may be attributed to the skew of the Italian Alps dataset towards larger events, and the small size and limited range of the Pacific Northwest data. For burned watersheds in the Western U.S. events, there is a clear progression in decreasing volume in debris flows as basins recover from the wildfire: it takes approximately 1 year, or at a few locations, as much as 3 years, for debris production to return to pre-fire rates. The difference is most apparent when the data are normalized for basin area (the area yield, which is 2× larger for burned basins) or for channel length (the length yield, which is 1.6× larger for burned basins). When normalized simultaneously for basin area, channel length, and channel gradient, burned areas produce significantly more debris (2.7–5.4 times as much). Burned areas in the Western USA are more sensitive to wildfire and produce larger debris flows than burned areas in more humid climates such as the Pacific Northwest.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 769
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of debris-flow volume and activity under different formation conditions
    Ma, Chao
    Hu, Kaiheng
    Tian, Mi
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 67 (02) : 261 - 273
  • [32] Acceptability of debris-flow disasters: Comparison of two case studies in China
    Liu, Xilin
    Miao, Cheng
    Guo, Lihua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 34 : 45 - 54
  • [33] Debris cones as a source of information on debris-flow activity
    Yafyazova, R. K.
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, : 87 - 93
  • [34] RADIATIVE SURFACE TEMPERATURES OF THE BURNED AND UNBURNED AREAS IN A TALLGRASS PRAIRIE
    ASRAR, G
    HARRIS, TR
    LAPITAN, RL
    COOPER, DI
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1988, 24 (03) : 447 - 457
  • [35] Comparison of debris-flow volume and activity under different formation conditions
    Chao Ma
    Kaiheng Hu
    Mi Tian
    Natural Hazards, 2013, 67 : 261 - 273
  • [36] Numerical simulation of debris-flow initiation
    Chen, RH
    Tseng, HZ
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 281 - 289
  • [37] A data-driven approach for modeling post-fire debris-flow volumes and their uncertainty
    Friedel, Michael J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (12) : 1583 - 1598
  • [38] Debris-flow of Zelongnong Ravine in Tibet
    Jinshan Zhang
    Xingju Shen
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 8 : 535 - 543
  • [39] Debris-flow occurrence probability on hillslopes
    Chen, JC
    Jan, CD
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 411 - 416
  • [40] TERRAIN TOPOGRAPHY AND DEBRIS-FLOW MODELLING
    Sodnik, Jost
    Petje, Urska
    Mikos, Matjaz
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2009, 53 (02) : 291 - 304