Comparison of debris-flow volumes from burned and unburned areas

被引:0
|
作者
Paul M. Santi
Luca Morandi
机构
[1] Colorado School of Mines,Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
来源
Landslides | 2013年 / 10卷
关键词
Debris flow; Magnitude; Yield rate; Wildfire; Recovery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goals of this work are to show the range of debris-flow volumes and watershed characteristics for several locations, and the differences in flow volumes for events triggered soon after wildfire. A dataset of 929 events was divided into groups based on location and burn status. The three unburned locations show significant differences: debris flows from the Italian Alps are larger and generate more debris per unit basin area or unit channel length than flows in the Western USA or in the Pacific Northwest. However, some of the observed differences may be attributed to the skew of the Italian Alps dataset towards larger events, and the small size and limited range of the Pacific Northwest data. For burned watersheds in the Western U.S. events, there is a clear progression in decreasing volume in debris flows as basins recover from the wildfire: it takes approximately 1 year, or at a few locations, as much as 3 years, for debris production to return to pre-fire rates. The difference is most apparent when the data are normalized for basin area (the area yield, which is 2× larger for burned basins) or for channel length (the length yield, which is 1.6× larger for burned basins). When normalized simultaneously for basin area, channel length, and channel gradient, burned areas produce significantly more debris (2.7–5.4 times as much). Burned areas in the Western USA are more sensitive to wildfire and produce larger debris flows than burned areas in more humid climates such as the Pacific Northwest.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 769
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Debris-flow volumes in northeastern Italy: Relationship with drainage area and size probability
    Marchi, Lorenzo
    Brunetti, Maria Teresa
    Cavalli, Marco
    Crema, Stefano
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (04) : 933 - 943
  • [22] A hybrid machine-learning model to estimate potential debris-flow volumes
    Huang, Jian
    Hales, Tristram C.
    Huang, Runqiu
    Ju, Nengpan
    Li, Qiao
    Huang, Yin
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2020, 367
  • [23] On the assessment of the management priority of sediment source areas in a debris-flow catchment
    D'Agostino, Vincenzo
    Bertoldi, Gabriele
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2014, 39 (05) : 656 - 668
  • [24] Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas
    Blahut, Jan
    van Westen, Cees J.
    Sterlacchini, Simone
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 119 (1-2) : 36 - 51
  • [25] Carnivores in burned and adjacent unburned areas in a Mediterranean ecosystem
    Birtsas, Perikles
    Sokos, Christos
    Exadactylos, Stavros
    MAMMALIA, 2012, 76 (04) : 407 - 415
  • [26] The debris-flow rheology myth
    Iverson, RM
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 303 - 314
  • [27] Systematic comparison of debris-flow laws at the Illgraben torrent, Switzerland
    McArdell, B
    Zanuttigh, B
    Lamberti, A
    Rickenmann, D
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 647 - 657
  • [28] ANATOMY OF DEBRIS-FLOW DEPOSITS
    STOW, DAV
    INITIAL REPORTS OF THE DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT, 1984, 75 (JUN): : 801 - 807
  • [29] Triggering of debris-flow by overland flow: A comparison between theoretical and experimental results
    Armanini, A
    Gregoretti, C
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 117 - 124
  • [30] Initiation and flow of various types of debris-flow
    Takahashi, T
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 15 - 25