Shaping ecological risk research for synthetic biology

被引:0
|
作者
Kuiken T. [1 ]
Dana G. [2 ]
Oye K. [3 ]
Rejeski D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Science and Technology Innovation Program, Woodrow Wilson Center, WA, DC, 20004, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
[2] Dana and Sharpe Risk Associates, Arlington, VA
[3] Engineering Systems Division and Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecological risk; Gene flow; Genetically modified organisms; Synthetic biology; Trading zones;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-014-0171-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary field that brings together biology and engineering at its core. Understanding and evaluating the ecological effects of synthetic biology applications also require broad interdisciplinary convergence and the ability to adapt to rapid technological developments. This article describes a series of workshops designed to provide a space for interdisciplinary groups of synthetic biologists, natural and social scientists, and other stakeholders to identify priority ecological hazards and to begin to design research programs to inform ecological risk assessments and risk management of synthetic biology applications. Participants identified gene flow, fitness, and competition as the key hazards of synthetic biology applications using engineered microorganisms. The rapid pace of synthetic biology research and product development, the potential environmental release of numerous applications, and the diffuse and diverse nature of the research community are prompting renewed attention on how to design robust ecological risk research programs to investigate such hazards. © 2014 AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shaping the future of synthetic biology
    Kuiken, Todd
    SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6232) : 296 - 296
  • [2] Ecological firewalls for synthetic biology
    Vidiella, Blai
    Sole, Ricard
    ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (07)
  • [3] EcoGenoRisk : Developing a computational ecological risk assessment tool for synthetic biology
    Ulanova, Anna
    Mansfeldt, Cresten
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 346
  • [4] Synthetic biology for translational research
    Burbelo, Peter D.
    Ching, Kathryn H.
    Han, Brian L.
    Klimavicz, Caitlin M.
    Iadarola, Michael J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 2 (04): : 381 - 389
  • [5] Synthetic biology and occupational risk
    Howard, John
    Murashov, Vladimir
    Schulte, Paul
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2017, 14 (03) : 224 - 236
  • [6] Ecological perspectives on synthetic biology: insights from microbial population biology
    Escalante, Ana E.
    Rebolleda-Gomez, Maria
    Benitez, Mariana
    Travisano, Michael
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [7] Risk in synthetic biology—views from the labEarly career scientists’ concerns about synthetic biology open up new perspectives on risk and responsibility in research
    Carmen McLeod
    Stevienna de Saille
    Brigitte Nerlich
    The EMBO Reports, 2018, 19 (7):
  • [8] Patent issues in synthetic biology research
    Schwartz, Jörg
    Photonics Spectra, 2010, 44 (02)
  • [9] Translating cancer research by synthetic biology
    Shankar, Sumitra
    Pillai, M. Radhakrishna
    MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2011, 7 (06) : 1802 - 1810
  • [10] SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY AND THE RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
    White, Karolyn
    Vemulpad, Subramanyam
    MACQUARIE LAW JOURNAL, 2015, 15 : 59 - 63