Uncertainty Estimation in PM10 Mass Measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Jyoti Pokhariyal
Anubha Mandal
Shankar G. Aggarwal
机构
[1] CSIR-National Physical Laboratory,
[2] Delhi Technological University,undefined
来源
MAPAN | 2019年 / 34卷
关键词
PM; NAAQS; Measurement uncertainty; PM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mass measurements of particles in the atmosphere are important for regulatory and scientific purposes. In nearly all of the countries, particulates ≤ 10 µm in aerodynamic size (PM10) are one of the most significant parameters of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In India, as given in NAAQS, the PM10 regulatory limit is 60 µg m−3 which is based on the annual mean weight of samples (minimum 104) annually at a specific site taken for two/three days in a week for 24 h. In this paper, the components of uncertainty involved in the filter-based sampling of PM10 along with the gravimetric determination of mass have been calculated. As per the EPA guidelines, PM10 mass was monitored for a year at NPL (National Physical Laboratory), New Delhi from January 2014 to January 2015. The 24-h time-weighted mean mass concentration (n = 104) for one-year measurement varied from 32.5 to 480.2 µg m−3.During the study, high mass loading was observed in the month of December to February. In general, the flow rate of the sampling has been reported to be major uncertainty component in size-segregated PM sampling. In this work, the flow rate of the sampling (90.4%) and charge effect of the filter (6.7%) had the major contribution in the total uncertainty budget of PM10 mass measurement. Rest of the uncertainty components, e.g., balances (0.39%) and conditioning of filter (2.39%), had the least contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 133
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimation of Surface Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) Mass Concentrations from Ceilometer Backscattered Profiles
    Parde, Avinash N.
    Ghude, Sachin D.
    Pithani, Prakash
    Dhangar, Narendra G.
    Nivdange, Sandip
    Krishna, Gopal
    Lal, D. M.
    Jenamani, R.
    Singh, Pankaj
    Jena, Chinmay
    Karumuri, Ramakrishna
    Safai, P. D.
    Chate, D. M.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (07) : 1640 - 1650
  • [22] Simultaneous measurements of PM10 and PM1 using a single TEOM
    Krieger, Ulrich K.
    Rupp, Sabrina
    Hausammann, Edwin
    Peter, Thomas
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (11) : 975 - 980
  • [23] Measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 particle concentrations in Athens, Greece
    Chaloulakou, A
    Kassomenos, P
    Spyrellis, N
    Demokritou, P
    Koutrakis, P
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (05) : 649 - 660
  • [24] Enhancement of PM2.5 exposure estimation using PM10 observations
    Yuval
    Broday, David M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2014, 16 (05) : 1094 - 1102
  • [25] Statistical analysis of PM10 measurements in Cordoba City, Argentina
    Olcese, LE
    Toselli, BM
    METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 1998, 66 (1-2) : 123 - 130
  • [26] Statistical analysis of PM10 measurements in Cordoba city, Argentina
    L. E. Olcese
    B. M. Toselli
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 1998, 66 : 123 - 130
  • [27] PM10 in Canada
    Department of Geography, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States
    不详
    不详
    Sci. Total Environ., (57-71):
  • [28] Asthma and PM10
    Donaldson K.
    Gilmour M.I.
    MacNee W.
    Respiratory Research, 2000, 1 (1) : 12 - 15
  • [29] Uncertainty estimation in analysis of particulate-bound mercury in different size fractions of PM10 in ambient air
    Gajghate, D. G.
    Khaparde, V. V.
    Pustode, T. M.
    Pipalatkar, P. P.
    Rao, C. V. Chalapati
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2011, 16 (8-9) : 459 - 465
  • [30] Uncertainty estimation in analysis of particulate-bound mercury in different size fractions of PM10 in ambient air
    D. G. Gajghate
    V. V. Khaparde
    T. M. Pustode
    P. P. Pipalatkar
    C. V. Chalapati Rao
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2011, 16 : 459 - 465