Ecological Compensation Estimation of Soil and Water Conservation Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Lina Sun
Wenxi Lu
Qingchun Yang
Jordi Delgado Martín
Di Li
机构
[1] Jilin University,Key Lab of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education and Key Lab of Water Resources and Aquatic Environment, Jilin Province, College of Environment and Resources
[2] Universidad de A Coruña,Escuela de Ingenieros de Caminos
[3] Jilin Province Water Resource and Hydropower Consultative Company of P.P.CHINA,undefined
来源
关键词
Ecological compensation; Soil and water conservation; SWAT model; Cost-benefit analysis; Catchment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil and water conservation ecological compensation can be simply defined as a monetary payment to offset the environmental loss. An illustration is given in this study describing the payment compensation to water resource conservation and soil losses in Erlongshan reservoir catchment, China. A semi-distributed hydrological SWAT model was applied to establish compensation standard considering six scenarios of land use changes by combined application of remote sensing and geographic information systems. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) method is applied to evaluate the function of soil and water conservation, of which marginal opportunity cost and market value methods have been explored calculate the cost and benefit of water and soil conservation ecological function from provider and beneficiaries. Finally the ecological compensation of soil and water conservation for different land-use scenarios is calculated incorporating benefit apportion coefficient. The results provide an economically evaluated and market-oriented standard for the study of eco-compensation of environmental services and will be of great benefit to the implementation of soil and water conservation at a mesoscale catchment scale.
引用
收藏
页码:2709 / 2727
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-benefit based prioritisation of orangutan conservation actions in Indonesian Borneo
    Morgans, Courtney L.
    Santika, Truly
    Meijaard, Erik
    Ancrenaz, Marc
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 238
  • [32] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [33] An integrated approach to prioritizing ecological restoration of abandoned mine lands based on cost-benefit analysis
    Dong, Zhichao
    Bian, Zhenxing
    Jin, Wenjuan
    Guo, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Yufei
    Liu, Xiaochen
    Wang, Chuqiao
    Guan, Deyang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 924
  • [34] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [35] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [36] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418
  • [37] In Defence of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Ergas, Henry
    AGENDA-A JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM, 2009, 16 (03) : 31 - 40
  • [38] Cost-benefit analysis: examples
    Linn, Mott
    BOTTOM LINE, 2011, 24 (01): : 68 - 72
  • [39] EQUITY IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    PEARCE, DW
    WISE, J
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1972, 6 (03) : 324 - 325
  • [40] Liraglutide: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Schoeffski, O.
    Mentrup, S.
    Lund, N.
    Pfuetzner, A.
    DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2010, 19 (03): : 177 - 184