A regionally-adaptable ground-motion model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe

被引:0
|
作者
Sreeram Reddy Kotha
Graeme Weatherill
Dino Bindi
Fabrice Cotton
机构
[1] Helmholtz Centre Potsdam,Institute of Geosciences
[2] GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences,undefined
[3] Univ. Grenoble Alpes,undefined
[4] Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc,undefined
[5] CNRS,undefined
[6] IRD,undefined
[7] IFSTTAR,undefined
[8] ISTerre,undefined
[9] University of Potsdam,undefined
来源
关键词
Ground-motion model; Response spectra; Robust mixed-effects regression; Regionally adaptable; Seismic hazard and risk; Europe;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To complement the new European Strong-Motion dataset and the ongoing efforts to update the seismic hazard and risk assessment of Europe and Mediterranean regions, we propose a new regionally adaptable ground-motion model (GMM). We present here the GMM capable of predicting the 5% damped RotD50 of PGA, PGV, and SAT=0.01-8s\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ SA\left( {T = 0.01 - 8\,{\text{s}}} \right) $$\end{document} from shallow crustal earthquakes of 3≤MW≤7.4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ 3 \le M_{W} \le 7.4 $$\end{document} occurring 0<RJB≤545km\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ 0 < R_{JB} \le 545\,{\text{km}} $$\end{document} away from sites with 90≤Vs30≤3000ms-1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ 90 \le V_{s30} \le 3000\,{\text{m}}\,{\text{s}}^{ - 1} $$\end{document} or 0.001≤slope≤1mm-1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ 0.001 \le slope \le 1\,{\text{m}}\,{\text{m}}^{ - 1} $$\end{document}. The extended applicability derived from thousands of new recordings, however, comes with an apparent increase in the aleatory variability (σ). Firstly, anticipating contaminations and peculiarities in the dataset, we employed robust mixed-effect regressions to down weigh only, and not eliminate entirely, the influence of outliers on the GMM median and σ. Secondly, we regionalised the attenuating path and localised the earthquake sources using the most recent models, to quantify region-specific anelastic attenuation and locality-specific earthquake characteristics as random-effects, respectively. Thirdly, using the mixed-effect variance–covariance structure, the GMM can be adapted to new regions, localities, and sites with specific datasets. Consequently, the σ is curtailed to a 7% increase at T < 0.3 s, and a substantial 15% decrease at T ≥ 0.3 s, compared to the RESORCE based partially non-ergodic GMM. We provide the 46 attenuating region-, 56 earthquake localities-, and 1829 site-specific adjustments, demonstrate their usage, and present their robustness through a 10-fold cross-validation exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:4091 / 4125
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Summary of the BA18 Ground-Motion Model for Fourier Amplitude Spectra for Crustal Earthquakes in California
    Bayless, Jeff
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (05) : 2088 - 2105
  • [22] Ground motion prediction model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Japan based on XGBoost with Bayesian optimization
    Dang, Haotian
    Wang, Zifa
    Zhao, Dengke
    Wang, Xiangqi
    Li, Zhaoyan
    Wei, Dongliang
    Wang, Jianming
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 177
  • [23] Peak ground accelerations from large (M ≥ 7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes: a comparison with predictions from eight recent ground-motion models
    John Douglas
    David M. Boore
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16 : 1 - 21
  • [24] Ground-motion model for subduction earthquakes in northern South America
    Arteta, Carlos A.
    Pajaro, Cesar A.
    Mercado, Vicente
    Montejo, Julian
    Arcila, Monica
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2021, 37 (04) : 2419 - 2452
  • [25] Horizontal offshore ground-motion models for shallow crustal and upper mantle earthquakes of S-net in the Japan Trench area
    Tan, Jingyang
    Yan, Shilong
    Chen, Denghong
    Zhang, Qi
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2025, 68 (02): : 636 - 651
  • [26] A Partially Nonergodic Ground-Motion Model for Cascadia Interface Earthquakes
    Sung, Chih-Hsuan
    Abrahamson, Norman
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2022, 112 (05) : 2520 - 2541
  • [27] Testing the Global Applicability of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Active Shallow Crustal Regions
    Delavaud, Elise
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Kuehn, Nicolas
    Allen, Trevor
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 102 (02) : 707 - 721
  • [28] A ground motion model for orientation-independent inelastic spectral displacements from shallow crustal earthquakes
    Aristeidou, Savvinos
    Tarbali, Karim
    O'Reilly, Gerard J.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2023, 39 (03) : 1601 - 1624
  • [29] Peak ground accelerations from large (M aeyen 7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes: a comparison with predictions from eight recent ground-motion models
    Douglas, John
    Boore, David M.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [30] GK17 Ground-Motion Prediction Equation for Horizontal PGA and 5% Damped PSA from Shallow Crustal Continental Earthquakes
    Graizer, Vladimir
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 108 (01) : 380 - 398