Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: a mixed-methods approach

被引:15
|
作者
Puryear L. [1 ]
Downs N. [1 ]
Nevedal A. [2 ]
Lewis E.T. [2 ]
Ormond K.E. [3 ]
Bregendahl M. [4 ]
Suarez C.J. [5 ]
David S.P. [4 ]
Charlap S. [6 ]
Chu I. [7 ]
Asch S.M. [4 ]
Pakdaman N. [4 ]
Chang S.-I. [4 ]
Cullen M.R. [7 ]
Palaniappan L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[2] Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Livermore, CA
[3] Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[4] Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, MC: 5475, Stanford, 94305, CA
[5] Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[6] GeneYes, LLC, Palo Alto, CA
[7] Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
关键词
Genetics; Patient-centered care; Personalized medicine; Physician decision support; Primary care;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-017-0349-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While genetic testing gains adoption in specialty services such as oncology, neurology, and cardiology, use of genetic and genomic testing has yet to be adopted as widely in primary care. The purpose of this study is to identify and compare patient and primary care provider (PCP) expectations of genetics services in primary care. Patient and PCP perspectives were assessed through a mixed-method approach combining an online survey and semi-structured interviews in a primary care department of a large academic medical institution. A convenience sample of 100 adult primary care patients and 26 PCPs was gathered. The survey and interview questions focused on perceptions of genetic testing, experience with genetic testing, and expectations of genetic services in primary care. Patients felt that their PCP was knowledgeable about genetic testing and expected their PCP to be the first to recognize a need for genetic testing based on family history. Nonetheless, patients reported that PCPs rarely used family history information to discuss genetic risks or order testing. In contrast, PCPs felt uncertain about the clinical utility and scientific value of genetic testing. PCPs were concerned that genetic testing could cause anxiety, frustration, discrimination, and reduced insurability, and that there was unequal access to testing. PCPs described themselves as being “gatekeepers” to genetic testing but did not feel confident or have the desire to become experts in genetic testing. However, PCPs were open to increasing their working knowledge of genetic testing. Within this academic medical center, there is a gap between what patients expect and what primary care providers feel they are adequately prepared to provide in terms of genetic testing services. © 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing multilevel determinants of adoption and implementation of genomic medicine: an organizational mixed-methods approach
    Oishi, Sabine M.
    Marshall, Nell
    Hamilton, Alison B.
    Yano, Elizabeth M.
    Lerner, Barbara
    Scheuner, Maren T.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (11) : 919 - 926
  • [42] Postdoctoral scholars' perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study
    Nowell, Lorelli
    Ovie, Glory
    Kenny, Natasha
    Jacobsen, Michele
    PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [43] Postdoctoral scholars’ perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study
    Lorelli Nowell
    Glory Ovie
    Natasha Kenny
    Michele Jacobsen
    Palgrave Communications, 6
  • [44] A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient-Provider E-Mail Content in a Safety-Net Setting
    Mirsky, Jacob B.
    Tieu, Lina
    Lyles, Courtney
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2016, 21 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [45] Gastrointestinal Surgical Patient and Multidisciplinary Healthcare Provider Beliefs and Practices Around Perioperative Nutrition: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Arbaugh, Carlie
    Kimura, Cintia
    Kin, Cindy
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 302 : 80 - 91
  • [46] The Patient-Provider Relationship Is Associated with Hepatitis C Treatment Eligibility: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Cohort Study
    Rogal, Shari S.
    Arnold, Robert M.
    Chapko, Michael
    Hanusa, Barbara V.
    Youk, Ada
    Switzer, Galen E.
    Sevick, Mary Ann
    Bayliss, Nichole K.
    Zook, Carolyn L.
    Chidi, Alexis
    Obrosky, David S.
    Zickmund, Susan L.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [47] A Mixed-methods Exploration of Patient Perspectives on Pap Therapy Initiation: Implications for Improved Outreach and Education
    Kaye, L.
    Lyson, H. C.
    Boers, E.
    Allen, A.
    Vuong, V. T.
    Bala, V.
    Barrett, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [48] Patient Perspectives on Declining to Participate in Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Schopfer, David W.
    Nicosia, Francesca M.
    Ottoboni, Linda
    Whooley, Mary A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2020, 40 (05) : 335 - 340
  • [49] Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Decision Quality Surrounding Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Turchioe, Meghan Reading
    Mangal, Sabrina
    Ancker, Jessica
    Slotwiner, David J.
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [50] THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF A BONE FRACTURE ON WOMEN WITH OSTEOPOROSIS: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY OF PATIENT AND CAREGIVER PERSPECTIVES
    Marziliano, Allison
    Diefenbach, Michael A.
    Pfister, Halie
    Garcia, Daniela
    Kim, Tara
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (SUPP 1) : S649 - S649