Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: a mixed-methods approach

被引:15
|
作者
Puryear L. [1 ]
Downs N. [1 ]
Nevedal A. [2 ]
Lewis E.T. [2 ]
Ormond K.E. [3 ]
Bregendahl M. [4 ]
Suarez C.J. [5 ]
David S.P. [4 ]
Charlap S. [6 ]
Chu I. [7 ]
Asch S.M. [4 ]
Pakdaman N. [4 ]
Chang S.-I. [4 ]
Cullen M.R. [7 ]
Palaniappan L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[2] Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Livermore, CA
[3] Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[4] Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, MC: 5475, Stanford, 94305, CA
[5] Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[6] GeneYes, LLC, Palo Alto, CA
[7] Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
关键词
Genetics; Patient-centered care; Personalized medicine; Physician decision support; Primary care;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-017-0349-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While genetic testing gains adoption in specialty services such as oncology, neurology, and cardiology, use of genetic and genomic testing has yet to be adopted as widely in primary care. The purpose of this study is to identify and compare patient and primary care provider (PCP) expectations of genetics services in primary care. Patient and PCP perspectives were assessed through a mixed-method approach combining an online survey and semi-structured interviews in a primary care department of a large academic medical institution. A convenience sample of 100 adult primary care patients and 26 PCPs was gathered. The survey and interview questions focused on perceptions of genetic testing, experience with genetic testing, and expectations of genetic services in primary care. Patients felt that their PCP was knowledgeable about genetic testing and expected their PCP to be the first to recognize a need for genetic testing based on family history. Nonetheless, patients reported that PCPs rarely used family history information to discuss genetic risks or order testing. In contrast, PCPs felt uncertain about the clinical utility and scientific value of genetic testing. PCPs were concerned that genetic testing could cause anxiety, frustration, discrimination, and reduced insurability, and that there was unequal access to testing. PCPs described themselves as being “gatekeepers” to genetic testing but did not feel confident or have the desire to become experts in genetic testing. However, PCPs were open to increasing their working knowledge of genetic testing. Within this academic medical center, there is a gap between what patients expect and what primary care providers feel they are adequately prepared to provide in terms of genetic testing services. © 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Culturally Sensitive, Mixed-Methods Approach to Analysing a Leadership Development Program
    Wardale, Dorothy
    Cameron, Roslyn
    Li, Jun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM 2015), 2015, : 390 - 395
  • [32] A mixed-methods evaluation of college student and provider perspectives on a smartphone application for help-seeking after violence
    Anderson, Jocelyn C.
    Pollitt, Erin
    Crowley, Joseph
    Holbrook, Debra
    Moret, Jessica E. Draughon
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2021, 69 (06) : 668 - 674
  • [33] A mixed-methods study of healthcare provider perspectives on the barriers to enrollment of minority patients on cancer clinical trials.
    Kim, Yonghun
    O'Shea, Mary
    Asiedu, Gladys
    Price, Katharine Andress Rowe
    Warsame, Rahma M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16) : E18544 - E18544
  • [34] Perspectives of medicine, human biology, and nursing undergraduates on transversal skills learning: a mixed-methods study
    Fontana-Rosa, Nathalia Silva
    Paz, Luis Gonzalez-de
    Codina-Rodriguez, Ana C.
    Perez-Riart, Maria
    Carrio-Llach, Maria del Mar
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [35] Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design
    Tommel, Judith
    Kenis, Daan
    Lambrechts, Nathalie
    Brohet, Richard M.
    Swysen, Jordy
    Mollen, Lotte
    Hoefmans, Marie-Jose F.
    Pusparum, Murih
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    Ertaylan, Goekhan
    Roos, Marco
    Hens, Kristien
    Houwink, Elisa J. F.
    GENES, 2023, 14 (04)
  • [36] Defining Criteria for Guiding Cancer Patients to Find a Reputable Complementary Medicine Provider: Results of a Mixed-Methods Study
    Rogge, Alize
    Baur, Isabel
    Blettner, Gabriele
    Holtkamp, Ulrike
    Horneber, Markus
    Jahn, Patrick
    Joos, Stefanie
    Keberle, Silva
    Kettelgerdes, Anita
    Klemperer, David
    Laengler, Alfred
    Voiss, Petra
    Weiss, Joachim
    Witt, Claudia
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 : 186 - 186
  • [37] Patient and provider experience and perspectives of a risk-based approach to multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care: a mixed methods study
    Smekal, Michelle D.
    Tam-Tham, Helen
    Finlay, Juli
    Donald, Maoliosa
    Thomas, Chandra
    Weaver, Robert G.
    Quinn, Robert R.
    Tam, Kin
    Manns, Braden J.
    Tonelli, Marcello
    Bello, Aminu
    Tangri, Navdeep
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [38] Patient and provider experience and perspectives of a risk-based approach to multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care: a mixed methods study
    Michelle D. Smekal
    Helen Tam-Tham
    Juli Finlay
    Maoliosa Donald
    Chandra Thomas
    Robert G. Weaver
    Robert R. Quinn
    Kin Tam
    Braden J. Manns
    Marcello Tonelli
    Aminu Bello
    Navdeep Tangri
    Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
    BMC Nephrology, 20
  • [39] Patient's Subjective Impression of Cervical Range of Motion A Mixed-methods Approach
    Langenfeld, Anke
    Bastiaenen, Carolien
    Sieben, Judith
    Humphreys, B. Kim
    Swanenburg, Jaap
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (18) : E1082 - E1088
  • [40] Medical assistance in dying: Examining Canadian pharmacy perspectives using a mixed-methods approach
    Verweel, Lee
    Rosenberg-Yunger, Zahava R. S.
    Movahedi, Taranom
    Malek, Allan H.
    CANADIAN PHARMACISTS JOURNAL, 2018, 151 (02) : 121 - 132