Comparing the German Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist

被引:0
|
作者
H. Klasen
W. Woerner
D. Wolke
R. Meyer
S. Overmeyer
W. Kaschnitz
A. Rothenberger
R. Goodman
机构
[1] Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry St. George's Medical School,
[2] Tooting GB – London SW17 0RE,undefined
[3] Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University of Göttingen von-Siebold Str. 5 D-37075 Göttingen,undefined
[4] University of Hertfordshire Department of Psychology,undefined
[5] College Lane GB – Hatfield,undefined
[6] Herts AL10 9AB,undefined
[7] Lehrstuhl für Psychologie IV Röntgenring 10 D-97074 Würzburg,undefined
[8] Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Philosophenstrasse 3-5 D-07740 Jena,undefined
[9] Universitäts Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde Klinische Abteilung für Allgemein Pädiatrie,undefined
[10] Auenbruggerplatz 30 A-8036 Graz,undefined
[11] Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,undefined
[12] Institute of Psychiatry De Crespigny Park GB – London SE5 8AZ,undefined
关键词
Key words Child psychopathology – psychometrics – questionnaires – validity – German;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that can be completed in about 5 minutes by the parents and teachers of 4–16 year olds. The scores of the English version correlate well with those of the considerably longer Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The present study compares the German versions of the questionnaires. Both SDQ and CBCL were completed by the parents of 273 children drawn from psychiatric clinics (N = 163) and from a community sample (N = 110). The children from the community sample also filled in the SDQ self-report and the Youth Self Report (YSR). The children from the clinic sample received an ICD-10 diagnosis if applicable. Scores from the parent and self-rated SDQ and CBCL/YSR were highly correlated and equally able to distinguish between the community and clinic samples, with the SDQ showing significantly better results regarding the total scores. They were also equally able to distinguish between disorders within the clinic sample, the only significant difference being that the SDQ was better able to differentiate between children with and without hyperactivity-inattention. The study shows that like the English originals, the SDQ-Deu and the German CBCL are equally valid for most clinical and research purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric properties and normative data of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Latvian general adolescent population
    Bezborodovs, Nikita
    Kregers, Rudolfs
    Vetra, Lelde
    Rancans, Elmars
    Villerusa, Anita
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 78 (04) : 301 - 311
  • [42] German Parents and Educators of Two to Four-Year-Old Children as Informants for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Dubiel, Simone
    Cohen, Franziska
    Anders, Yvonne
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2024,
  • [43] Epidemiological Study of Youth Mental Health Using Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Arman, S.
    Keypour, M.
    Maracy, M. R.
    Attari, A.
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (06) : 371 - 375
  • [44] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Factor Structure and Gender Equivalence in Norwegian Adolescents
    Boe, Tormod
    Hysing, Mari
    Skogen, Jens Christoffer
    Breivik, Kyrre
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [45] Behavioral assessment of Japanese children with epilepsy using SDQ (strengths and difficulties questionnaire)
    Tanabe, Takuya
    Kashiwagi, Mitsuru
    Shimakawa, Shuichi
    Fukui, Miho
    Kadobayashi, Kazuko
    Azumakawa, Kohji
    Tamai, Hiroshi
    Wakamiya, Eiji
    BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 35 (01): : 81 - 86
  • [46] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Africa: a scoping review of its application and validation
    Nikhat Hoosen
    Eugene Lee Davids
    Petrus J. de Vries
    Maylene Shung-King
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 12
  • [47] Evaluating Measurement Invariance Between Parents Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Chiorri, Carlo
    Hall, James
    Casely-Hayford, Jeffrey
    Malmberg, Lars-Erik
    ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [48] A clinical usefulness of Korean version of strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ-Kr)
    Ahn, J.
    Park, S.
    Shin, J.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 20 : S628 - S628
  • [49] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Africa: a scoping review of its application and validation
    Hoosen, Nikhat
    Davids, Eugene Lee
    de Vries, Petrus J.
    Shung-King, Maylene
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 12
  • [50] Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in a Spanish sample
    Javier Rodriguez-Hernandez, Pedro
    Betancort, Moises
    Mario Ramirez-Santana, Gustavo
    Garcia, Ruth
    Sanz-Alvarez, Emilio J.
    De las Cuevas-Castresana, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 12 (02) : 265 - 279