Comparing the German Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist

被引:0
|
作者
H. Klasen
W. Woerner
D. Wolke
R. Meyer
S. Overmeyer
W. Kaschnitz
A. Rothenberger
R. Goodman
机构
[1] Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry St. George's Medical School,
[2] Tooting GB – London SW17 0RE,undefined
[3] Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University of Göttingen von-Siebold Str. 5 D-37075 Göttingen,undefined
[4] University of Hertfordshire Department of Psychology,undefined
[5] College Lane GB – Hatfield,undefined
[6] Herts AL10 9AB,undefined
[7] Lehrstuhl für Psychologie IV Röntgenring 10 D-97074 Würzburg,undefined
[8] Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Philosophenstrasse 3-5 D-07740 Jena,undefined
[9] Universitäts Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde Klinische Abteilung für Allgemein Pädiatrie,undefined
[10] Auenbruggerplatz 30 A-8036 Graz,undefined
[11] Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,undefined
[12] Institute of Psychiatry De Crespigny Park GB – London SE5 8AZ,undefined
关键词
Key words Child psychopathology – psychometrics – questionnaires – validity – German;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that can be completed in about 5 minutes by the parents and teachers of 4–16 year olds. The scores of the English version correlate well with those of the considerably longer Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The present study compares the German versions of the questionnaires. Both SDQ and CBCL were completed by the parents of 273 children drawn from psychiatric clinics (N = 163) and from a community sample (N = 110). The children from the community sample also filled in the SDQ self-report and the Youth Self Report (YSR). The children from the clinic sample received an ICD-10 diagnosis if applicable. Scores from the parent and self-rated SDQ and CBCL/YSR were highly correlated and equally able to distinguish between the community and clinic samples, with the SDQ showing significantly better results regarding the total scores. They were also equally able to distinguish between disorders within the clinic sample, the only significant difference being that the SDQ was better able to differentiate between children with and without hyperactivity-inattention. The study shows that like the English originals, the SDQ-Deu and the German CBCL are equally valid for most clinical and research purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Proxy Measure of Parenting Stress
    McSherry, Dominic
    Malet, Montse Fargas
    Weatherall, Kerrylee
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 49 (01): : 96 - 115
  • [22] The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
    Hall, Charlotte L.
    Guo, Boliang
    Valentine, Althea Z.
    Groom, Madeline J.
    Daley, David
    Sayal, Kapil
    Hollis, Chris
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [23] Criterion validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) with inpatient adolescents
    Kovacs, Stephanie
    Sharp, Carla
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2014, 219 (03) : 651 - 657
  • [24] A critical examination of Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Rasmussen, Ida Scheel
    Strandberg-Larsen, Katrine
    Overbeck, Gritt
    Wilson, Philip
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, : 818 - 823
  • [25] The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries
    Gian Marco Marzocchi
    Christiane Capron
    Mario Di Pietro
    Enric Duran Tauleria
    Michel Duyme
    Alessandra Frigerio
    Maria Filomena Gaspar
    Helena Hamilton
    Gérard Pithon
    Alexandra Simões
    Carine Thérond
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004, 13 : ii40 - ii46
  • [26] The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries
    Marzocchi, GM
    Capron, C
    Di Pietro, M
    Tauleria, ED
    Duyme, M
    Frigerio, A
    Gaspar, MF
    Hamilton, H
    Pithon, G
    Simoes, A
    Thérond, C
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 13 (Suppl 2) : 40 - 46
  • [27] A critical examination of Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Scheel Rasmussen, Ida
    Strandberg-Larsen, Katrine
    Overbeck, Gritt
    Wilson, Philip
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023,
  • [28] An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Keller, Ferdinand
    Langmeyer, Alexandra N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 35 (02) : 266 - 279
  • [29] The factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Greek adolescents
    Giannakopoulos G.
    Tzavara C.
    Dimitrakaki C.
    Kolaitis G.
    Rotsika V.
    Tountas Y.
    Annals of General Psychiatry, 8 (1) : 20
  • [30] Normative data and psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in an Iranian community sample
    Shahrivar, Zahra
    Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi
    Pakbaz, Bahareh
    Rezaie, Azita
    Ahmadi, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 14 (02): : 69 - 77