Second fertility-sparing surgery and fertility-outcomes in patients with recurrent borderline ovarian tumors

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Lifei [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Qin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Hongjing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, West China Second Univ Hosp, 20,Sect 3,Renmin South Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Borderline ovarian tumors; Fertility sparing surgery; Radical surgery; Recurrence; Pregnancy outcome; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; RISK; SWEDEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-022-06431-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background At the time of recurrence, many borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) patients are still young with fertility needs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproductive outcomes and recurrence rate of second fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in women with recurrent BOTs. Methods Seventy-eight women of childbearing age diagnosed with recurrent BOTs from November 2009 to 2020 whose primary treatment was FSS were included. Results The FIGO stage I disease accounted for 46.2% and serous BOT accounted for 87.2% in the study group. Forty-seven patients underwent second FSS, and the remaining 31 underwent radical surgery (RS). Seventeen patients relapsed again after second surgery, but no malignant transformation and tumor-associated deaths were reported. Compared to FIGO stage I, the FIGO stage III tumors were more likely to relapse, but there was no statistical difference in pregnancy rate among patients with different stages. In the second FSS group, recurrence rate was higher in patients who underwent oophorocystectomy compared to patients with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO), but the pregnancy rate was similar. There was no significant difference in postoperative recurrence risk between USO and RS. The recurrence rate was not associated with operative route (laparoscopy or laparotomy), or lymphadenectomy, or postoperative chemotherapy. Among the 32 patients who tried to conceive, the pregnancy rate was 46.9% and live birth rate was 81.3%. Conclusion Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a safe procedure for FIGO stage I recurrent BOT patients with fertility needs, and can achieve a high postoperative pregnancy rate and live birth rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1183
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real Implication of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: Reproductive Outcomes
    Heras, Marta
    Alonso-Espias, Maria
    Arencibia, Octavio
    Minig, Lucas
    Marti, Lola
    Diestro, Maria Dolores
    Cespedes, Juan
    Niguez, Isabel
    Gil-Ibanez, Blanca
    Diaz-Feijoo, Berta
    Llueca, Antoni
    Rosado, Claudia
    Iacoponi, Sara
    de la Manzanara, Carlos Lopez
    Morales, Sara
    Fernandez-Galguera, Maria Jose
    Cano, Ana
    Gorostidi, Mikel
    Zapardiel, Ignacio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (13)
  • [42] Fertility-sparing surgery in cancer patients
    Uzan, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 89 - 89
  • [43] Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor
    Zhao, Dan
    Song, Yan
    Zhang, Yanan
    Li, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (04) : 787 - 791
  • [44] Fertility sparing surgery (FSS) in the management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOT)
    Zefiro, V.
    Bergamini, V.
    Donadello, N.
    Formenti, G.
    Siesto, G.
    Seveso, A.
    Ghezzi, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2007, 17 (04) : 945 - 945
  • [45] Fertility Sparing Surgery and Borderline Ovarian Tumours
    Kasaven, Lorraine S.
    Chawla, Mehar
    Jones, Benjamin P.
    Al-Memar, Maya
    Galazis, Nicolas
    Ahmed-Salim, Yousra
    El-Bahrawy, Mona
    Lavery, Stuart
    Saso, Srdjan
    Yazbek, Joseph
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [46] Fertility-sparing surgery in stage I unilateral borderline ovarian tumor: is ovarian cystectomy safe?
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kang, Ok-Ju
    Lee, Shin-Wha
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Suh, Dae Shik
    Kim, Yong Man
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (SUPPL_4) : A200 - A200
  • [47] The feasibility of fertility-sparing surgery in treating advanced-stage borderline ovarian tumors: A meta-analysis
    Huang, Yue
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Yong
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (03): : 319 - 325
  • [48] The impact of chemotherapy and fertility-sparing surgery on recurrence of serous borderline ovarian tumors: A multi-institutional study of 491 patients
    Brooks, R.
    Ghezelayagh, T.
    Kiet, T.
    Fuh, K.
    Ueda, S.
    Longacre, T.
    Teng, N.
    Chen, L.
    Chan, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S5 - S5
  • [49] Dataset on patients with Recurrent Borderline Ovarian Tumors and Table with Review of Literature on Fertility and Oncologic Outcomes of patients with Borderline Ovarian Tumors
    Plett, Helmut
    Ricciardi, Enzo
    Harter, Philipp
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Heitz, Florian
    Prader, Sonia
    Schneider, Stephanie
    Heikaus, Sebastian
    Fisseler-Eckhoff, Annette
    Kommoss, Friedrich
    Lax, Sigurd F.
    Staebler, Annette
    Traut, Alexander
    du Bois, Andreas
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 30
  • [50] Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early Ovarian Malignancies
    Zimmermann, Julia S. M.
    Ramisch, Pauline
    Radosa, Marc P.
    Radosa, Christoph G.
    Kaya, Askin C.
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Taran, Florin A.
    Ulrich, Uwe A.
    Hackethal, Andreas
    Deeken, Martin
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    Solomayer, Erich-Franz
    Radosa, Julia C.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (20)