Second fertility-sparing surgery and fertility-outcomes in patients with recurrent borderline ovarian tumors

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Lifei [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Qin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Hongjing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, West China Second Univ Hosp, 20,Sect 3,Renmin South Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Borderline ovarian tumors; Fertility sparing surgery; Radical surgery; Recurrence; Pregnancy outcome; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; RISK; SWEDEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-022-06431-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background At the time of recurrence, many borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) patients are still young with fertility needs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproductive outcomes and recurrence rate of second fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in women with recurrent BOTs. Methods Seventy-eight women of childbearing age diagnosed with recurrent BOTs from November 2009 to 2020 whose primary treatment was FSS were included. Results The FIGO stage I disease accounted for 46.2% and serous BOT accounted for 87.2% in the study group. Forty-seven patients underwent second FSS, and the remaining 31 underwent radical surgery (RS). Seventeen patients relapsed again after second surgery, but no malignant transformation and tumor-associated deaths were reported. Compared to FIGO stage I, the FIGO stage III tumors were more likely to relapse, but there was no statistical difference in pregnancy rate among patients with different stages. In the second FSS group, recurrence rate was higher in patients who underwent oophorocystectomy compared to patients with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO), but the pregnancy rate was similar. There was no significant difference in postoperative recurrence risk between USO and RS. The recurrence rate was not associated with operative route (laparoscopy or laparotomy), or lymphadenectomy, or postoperative chemotherapy. Among the 32 patients who tried to conceive, the pregnancy rate was 46.9% and live birth rate was 81.3%. Conclusion Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a safe procedure for FIGO stage I recurrent BOT patients with fertility needs, and can achieve a high postoperative pregnancy rate and live birth rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1183
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fertility-sparing surgery for young patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs): single institution experience
    Chen, Rui-fang
    Li, Jun
    Zhu, Ting-ting
    Yu, Hai-lin
    Lu, Xin
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2016, 9
  • [22] Fertility preservation after fertility-sparing surgery in women with borderline ovarian tumours
    Khiat, S.
    Provansal, M.
    Bottin, P.
    Saias-Magnan, J.
    Metzler-Guillemain, C.
    Courbiere, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 253 : 65 - 70
  • [23] Fertility-sparing surgery for young patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs): single institution experience
    Rui-fang Chen
    Jun Li
    Ting-ting Zhu
    Hai-lin Yu
    Xin Lu
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 9
  • [24] Oncologic and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for bilateral borderline ovarian tumors: A retrospective study
    Guo, Lili
    Kang, Xiaoyan
    Su, Yue
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Xie, Wan
    Meng, Silu
    Liu, Yuhuan
    Wang, Weijiao
    Wang, Changyu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 296 : 107 - 113
  • [25] Borderline ovarian tumours: management in the era of fertility-sparing surgery
    Maramai, Mattia
    Barra, Fabio
    Menada, Mario Valenzano
    Stigliani, Sara
    Moioli, Melita
    Costantini, Sergio
    Ferrero, Simone
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [26] Borderline ovarian tumors in reproductive-age women - Fertility-sparing surgery and outcome
    Chan, JK
    Lin, YG
    Loizzi, V
    Ghobriel, M
    DiSaia, PJ
    Berman, ML
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 48 (10) : 756 - 760
  • [27] The outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in borderline epithelial ovarian tumor: Oncologic safety and obstetrical outcomes
    Park, J.
    Kim, D.
    Suh, D.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, Y.
    Nam, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (03) : S50 - S50
  • [28] Fertility-sparing surgery and outcome in fertile women with ovarian borderline tumors and epithelial invasive ovarian cancer
    Borgfeldt, Christer
    Iosif, Constantin
    Masback, Anna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2007, 134 (01) : 110 - 114
  • [29] Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer
    Canlorbe, Geoffroy
    Chabbert-Buffet, Nathalie
    Uzan, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [30] Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Borderline Ovarian Tumour in Young: A Beacon in the Dark
    Bikram Bhardwaj
    Aruna Menon
    Souvik Nandy
    Aaphia Saphir Kathi
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2022, 20