Perceived Importance of Factors in Cannabis Purchase Decisions: A Best-worst Scaling Experiment

被引:24
|
作者
Zhu, Bin [1 ]
Guo, Huiying [2 ]
Cao, Ying [3 ]
An, Ruopeng [4 ]
Shi, Yuyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Epidemiol & Environm Hlth, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Best-worst scaling; Recreational Cannabis; Behavioral Economics; Consumer Preferences; Cannabis Legalization; RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION; HEALTH WARNING LABELS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ALCOHOL; PERCEPTIONS; PRICE; TAX; PREFERENCES; WASHINGTON; POTENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102793
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Consumers' access to cannabis has been considerably expanded in US states where recreational cannabis was legalized and commercialized. However, little is known about the important factors influencing consumers' purchase decisions in cannabis retail dispensaries. This study examined cannabis users' perceptions of the relative importance of policy-relevant factors when they made cannabis purchase decisions. Methods: An online survey was administered to 817 adult cannabis users in seven states in the US (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) that had approved cannabis commercialization by the time of interview in January 2018. Twenty policy-relevant cannabis attributes were evaluated, including those pertaining to product characteristics, quality, package characteristics, price and free sample, store characteristics, and restrictions on use. A best-worst scaling experiment was employed, which asked respondents to select the most and the least important attributes in a choice scenario. Each respondent answered 10 choice scenarios, each including a random combination of four attributes out of the 20. The relative importance of each attribute was evaluated using hierarchical Bayesian estimation of mixed logit models. Results: Overall, ' quality ', ' strain type ', ' price ', 'THC' (tetrahydrocannabinol) and ' pesticide ' were the top five important attributes affecting cannabis users' willingness to buy cannabis in a dispensary. These five attributes jointly accounted for approximately half of the total importance. In subsample analysis, both recreational and dual-purpose users attached higher importance to ' quality ', 'THC', and ' price ', whereas medical users tended to think 'CBD' (cannabidiol) and ' pesticide ' were more important. All cannabis users perceived ' package ' to be the least important attribute. Gender had no major differences in perceptions. Conclusions: Cannabis users in general perceived product characteristics, quality, and price to be important factors in their willingness to buy cannabis in dispensaries. There were heterogeneities in the perceptions by cannabis use purposes. The findings might deserve consideration in cannabis policy design.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Best-Worst Scaling in analytical closed-form solution
    Lipovetsky, Stan
    Conklin, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2014, 10 : 60 - 68
  • [42] Case 2 best-worst scaling: For good or for bad but not for both
    Soekhai, V
    Donkers, B.
    Levitan, B.
    De Bekker-Grob, E. W.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2021, 41
  • [43] Solar cooking in Senegalese villages: An application of best-worst scaling
    Vanschoenwinkel, Janka
    Lizin, Sebastien
    Swinnen, Gilbert
    Azadi, Hossein
    Van Passel, Steven
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 : 447 - 458
  • [44] Evaluating the Inclusion of Words and/or Pictures in Best-Worst Scaling Experiments
    Bir, Courtney
    Lai, John
    Thompson, Nathanael M.
    Widmar, Nicole Olynk
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FOOD & AGRIBUSINESS MARKETING, 2022, 34 (04) : 343 - 367
  • [45] Best-Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review
    Hollin, Ilene L.
    Paskett, Jonathan
    Schuster, Anne L. R.
    Crossnohere, Norah L.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (09) : 883 - 899
  • [46] Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care
    Cheung, Kei Long
    Wijnen, Ben F. M.
    Hollin, Ilene L.
    Janssen, Ellen M.
    Bridges, John F.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (12) : 1195 - 1209
  • [47] What outcomes do patients value after orthopaedic trauma: A best-worst scaling choice experiment
    Parry, Joshua A.
    Patterson, Joseph T.
    O'Hara, Nathan N.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55 (08):
  • [48] Measuring the importance of different barriers to opioid agonist treatment using best-worst scaling in an Australian setting
    Hall, Natasha Yvonne
    Le, Long
    Abimanyi-Ochom, Julie
    Mihalopoulos, Cathy
    HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 138
  • [49] Best-Worst Choice Experiment Designs for Consumers Buying Decisions for PDO Calanda Peaches: Attributes and Levels
    Groot, E.
    Albisu, L. M.
    VII INTERNATIONAL PEACH SYMPOSIUM, 2012, 962 : 307 - 314
  • [50] An empirical comparison of conjoint and best-worst scaling case III methods
    Cheng, Haotian
    Zhang, Tong
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Feuz, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 106