Perceived Importance of Factors in Cannabis Purchase Decisions: A Best-worst Scaling Experiment

被引:24
|
作者
Zhu, Bin [1 ]
Guo, Huiying [2 ]
Cao, Ying [3 ]
An, Ruopeng [4 ]
Shi, Yuyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Epidemiol & Environm Hlth, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Best-worst scaling; Recreational Cannabis; Behavioral Economics; Consumer Preferences; Cannabis Legalization; RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION; HEALTH WARNING LABELS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ALCOHOL; PERCEPTIONS; PRICE; TAX; PREFERENCES; WASHINGTON; POTENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102793
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Consumers' access to cannabis has been considerably expanded in US states where recreational cannabis was legalized and commercialized. However, little is known about the important factors influencing consumers' purchase decisions in cannabis retail dispensaries. This study examined cannabis users' perceptions of the relative importance of policy-relevant factors when they made cannabis purchase decisions. Methods: An online survey was administered to 817 adult cannabis users in seven states in the US (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) that had approved cannabis commercialization by the time of interview in January 2018. Twenty policy-relevant cannabis attributes were evaluated, including those pertaining to product characteristics, quality, package characteristics, price and free sample, store characteristics, and restrictions on use. A best-worst scaling experiment was employed, which asked respondents to select the most and the least important attributes in a choice scenario. Each respondent answered 10 choice scenarios, each including a random combination of four attributes out of the 20. The relative importance of each attribute was evaluated using hierarchical Bayesian estimation of mixed logit models. Results: Overall, ' quality ', ' strain type ', ' price ', 'THC' (tetrahydrocannabinol) and ' pesticide ' were the top five important attributes affecting cannabis users' willingness to buy cannabis in a dispensary. These five attributes jointly accounted for approximately half of the total importance. In subsample analysis, both recreational and dual-purpose users attached higher importance to ' quality ', 'THC', and ' price ', whereas medical users tended to think 'CBD' (cannabidiol) and ' pesticide ' were more important. All cannabis users perceived ' package ' to be the least important attribute. Gender had no major differences in perceptions. Conclusions: Cannabis users in general perceived product characteristics, quality, and price to be important factors in their willingness to buy cannabis in dispensaries. There were heterogeneities in the perceptions by cannabis use purposes. The findings might deserve consideration in cannabis policy design.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Best-worst scaling improves measurement of first impressions
    Burton, Nichola
    Burton, Michael
    Rigby, Dan
    Sutherland, Clare A. M.
    Rhodes, Gillian
    COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [22] Servicing in Sponsorship: A Best-Worst Scaling Empirical Analysis
    O'Reilly, Norm
    Huybers, Twan
    JOURNAL OF SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (02) : 155 - 169
  • [23] A comparison of best-worst scaling marginal and rank methods
    Cheng, Haotian
    Feuz, Ryan
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 31 (15) : 1379 - 1382
  • [24] Best-worst scaling improves measurement of first impressions
    Nichola Burton
    Michael Burton
    Dan Rigby
    Clare A. M. Sutherland
    Gillian Rhodes
    Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4
  • [25] Student evaluation of teaching: the use of best-worst scaling
    Huybers, Twan
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (04) : 496 - 513
  • [26] Eliciting older people's preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment
    Franco, Marcia R.
    Howard, Kirsten
    Sherrington, Catherine
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Rose, John
    Gomes, Juliana L.
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2015, 61 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [27] The Role of Trust in Explaining Food Choice: Combining Choice Experiment and Attribute Best-Worst Scaling
    Yeh, Ching-Hua
    Hartmann, Monika
    Langen, Nina
    FOODS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [28] Energy policy trade-offs in Poland: A best-worst scaling discrete choice experiment
    Aruga, Kentaka
    Bolt, Timothy
    Pest, Przemyslaw
    ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 156
  • [29] Using best-worst scaling to rank factors affecting vaccination demand in northern Nigeria
    Ozawa, Sachiko
    Wonodi, Chizoba
    Babalola, Olufemi
    Ismail, Tukur
    Bridges, John
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (47) : 6429 - 6437
  • [30] An importance-performance analysis of public transport to the university campus based on best-worst scaling
    Matas-Monroy, Javier Hernan
    Martin, Juan Carlos
    Roman, Concepcion
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2025, 109