Perceived Importance of Factors in Cannabis Purchase Decisions: A Best-worst Scaling Experiment

被引:24
|
作者
Zhu, Bin [1 ]
Guo, Huiying [2 ]
Cao, Ying [3 ]
An, Ruopeng [4 ]
Shi, Yuyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Epidemiol & Environm Hlth, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Best-worst scaling; Recreational Cannabis; Behavioral Economics; Consumer Preferences; Cannabis Legalization; RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION; HEALTH WARNING LABELS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ALCOHOL; PERCEPTIONS; PRICE; TAX; PREFERENCES; WASHINGTON; POTENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102793
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Consumers' access to cannabis has been considerably expanded in US states where recreational cannabis was legalized and commercialized. However, little is known about the important factors influencing consumers' purchase decisions in cannabis retail dispensaries. This study examined cannabis users' perceptions of the relative importance of policy-relevant factors when they made cannabis purchase decisions. Methods: An online survey was administered to 817 adult cannabis users in seven states in the US (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) that had approved cannabis commercialization by the time of interview in January 2018. Twenty policy-relevant cannabis attributes were evaluated, including those pertaining to product characteristics, quality, package characteristics, price and free sample, store characteristics, and restrictions on use. A best-worst scaling experiment was employed, which asked respondents to select the most and the least important attributes in a choice scenario. Each respondent answered 10 choice scenarios, each including a random combination of four attributes out of the 20. The relative importance of each attribute was evaluated using hierarchical Bayesian estimation of mixed logit models. Results: Overall, ' quality ', ' strain type ', ' price ', 'THC' (tetrahydrocannabinol) and ' pesticide ' were the top five important attributes affecting cannabis users' willingness to buy cannabis in a dispensary. These five attributes jointly accounted for approximately half of the total importance. In subsample analysis, both recreational and dual-purpose users attached higher importance to ' quality ', 'THC', and ' price ', whereas medical users tended to think 'CBD' (cannabidiol) and ' pesticide ' were more important. All cannabis users perceived ' package ' to be the least important attribute. Gender had no major differences in perceptions. Conclusions: Cannabis users in general perceived product characteristics, quality, and price to be important factors in their willingness to buy cannabis in dispensaries. There were heterogeneities in the perceptions by cannabis use purposes. The findings might deserve consideration in cannabis policy design.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using best-worst scaling to reveal perceived relative importance of website attributes
    Pascoe, Michael
    Wright, Owen
    Winzar, Hume
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2017, 29 (02) : 393 - 408
  • [2] Perceived Importance of the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Best-Worst Scaling Study
    Pluymen, Linda P. M.
    Yebyo, Henock G.
    Stegeman, Inge
    Fransen, Mirjam P.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Brabers, Anne E. M.
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : 918 - 924
  • [3] Analyzing Strawberry Preferences: Best-Worst Scaling Methodology and Purchase Styles
    Sparacino, Antonina
    Ollani, Selene
    Baima, Lorenzo
    Oliviero, Michael
    Borra, Danielle
    Rui, Mingze
    Mastromonaco, Giulia
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [4] The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best-Worst Scaling Experiment
    Pokhilenko, Irina
    Janssen, Luca M. M.
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    Drost, Ruben M. W. A.
    Paulus, Aggie T. G.
    Bremmers, Leonarda G. M.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [5] Challenges to informed consent for exome sequencing: A best-worst scaling experiment
    Gore, Rachel H.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Cohen, Julie S.
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2019, 28 (06) : 1189 - 1197
  • [6] Public preferences for street tree characteristics: A best-worst scaling experiment
    Doll, Claire
    Rollins, Curtis
    Rehdanz, Katrin
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    Burton, Michael
    Pannell, David
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2025, 104
  • [7] DETERMINATION OF IMPORTANCE FOR NEW VACCINE ADOPTION: A BEST-WORST SCALING METHOD
    Pooripussarakul, S.
    Riewpaiboon, A.
    Bishai, D.
    Bridges, J. F.
    Tantivess, S.
    Muangchana, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A47 - A47
  • [8] Best-Worst Scaling with many items
    Chrzan, Keith
    Peitz, Megan
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2019, 30 : 61 - 72
  • [9] Using best-worst scaling to inform policy decisions in Africa: a literature review
    Beres, Laura K.
    Campoamor, Nicola B.
    Hawthorn, Rachael
    Mugambi, Melissa L.
    Mulabe, Musunge
    Vhlakis, Natlie
    Kabongo, Michael
    Schuster, Anne
    Bridges, John F. P.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey
    Webb, Edward J. D.
    Meads, David
    Lynch, Yvonne
    Judge, Simon
    Randall, Nicola
    Goldbart, Juliet
    Meredith, Stuart
    Moulam, Liz
    Hess, Stephane
    Murray, Janice
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (04) : 575 - 584