Assessment of test method variables for in vitro skin irritation testing of medical device extracts

被引:12
|
作者
Olsen, Daniel S. [1 ]
Lee, Michelle [1 ]
Turley, Audrey P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nelson Labs LLC, Salt Lake City, UT 84123 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Medical devices; Irritation; Alternative testing; In vitro; Reconstructed human epidermis;
D O I
10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.012
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Skin irritation is an important component of the biological safety evaluation of medical devices. This testing has typically been performed using in vivo models. However, in an effort to reduce the need for in vivo testing, alternative methods for assessing skin irritation potential in vitro have been developed using a Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) model. During the development of the protocol for the round robin validation of in vitro irritation testing for medical device extracts, it became clear that there were three points in the procedure where different options may be validated within each laboratory for routine testing: sample exposure time (18 vs 24 h), SDS positive control concentration, and cytokine (IL-1 alpha) release testing. The goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of these variables. EpiDerm (TM) tissues were exposed to extracts of three plain polymer samples, and four polymers embedded with known irritant chemicals. Exposures were performed for 18 and 24 h. Resulting tissue viability was assessed by MIT reduction and IL-1 alpha release was assessed by ELISA. Testing was also performed using various concentrations of SDS ranging from 0.5 to 1% (w/v). Overall, results were similar for samples tested and 18 and 24 h, but the 18 h exposure time has the potential to have an impact on the results of some sample types. IL-1 alpha testing was shown to be useful to clarify conflicting tissue viability results. Use of a lower concentration of SDS as a positive control can help prevent issues that arise from excessive tissue damage often caused by 1% SDS.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EU: Acceptance of a new in vitro skin irritation method
    Kreysa, Joachim
    ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN, 2009, 26 (02): : 140 - 142
  • [22] Testing Method Development and Validation for in Vitro Skin Irritation Testing (SIT) by Using Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) Skin Equivalent - EPiTRI®
    Lin, Yu-Chun
    Hsu, Hui-Chun
    Lin, Chiu-Hsing
    Wu, Cheng-Yi
    Chen, Wannhsin
    Lai, Huey-Min
    ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING, 2019, : 8 - 18
  • [23] An integrated testing strategy for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation assessment using SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis
    Alepee, Nathalie
    Grandidier, Marie-Helene
    Tornier, Carine
    Cotovio, Jose
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2015, 29 (07) : 1779 - 1792
  • [24] A strategy for the assessment of skin corrosion and irritation without animal testing
    Earl, LK
    Basketter, DA
    Barratt, MD
    Whittle, G
    Chamberlain, M
    TENSIDE SURFACTANTS DETERGENTS, 1997, 34 (06) : 446 - 449
  • [25] The EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests -: An assessment of the performance of the optimised test
    Kandárová, H
    Liebsch, M
    Gerner, I
    Schmidt, E
    Genschow, E
    Traue, D
    Spielmann, H
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2005, 33 (04): : 351 - 367
  • [26] Risk assessment of the in vitro skin irritation of pesticides using the human skin model
    Kim, Mi-Kyeong
    Jeong, Mihye
    You, Are-Sun
    Hong, Soon-Sung
    Park, Soo-Jin
    Park, Kyung-Hun
    Park, Jae-Eup
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 211 : S109 - S109
  • [27] Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol
    Kandarova, Helena
    Bendova, Hana
    Letasiova, Silvia
    Coleman, Kelly P.
    De Jong, Wim H.
    Jirova, Dagmar
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2018, 50 : 433 - 438
  • [28] Proof of concept testing of a positive reference material for in vivo and in vitro skin irritation testing
    Nomura, Yusuke
    Lee, Michelle
    Fukui, Chie
    Watanabe, Kayo
    Olsen, Daniel
    Turley, Audrey
    Morishita, Yuki
    Kawakami, Tsuyoshi
    Yuba, Toshiyasu
    Fujimaki, Hideo
    Inoue, Kaoru
    Yoshida, Midori
    Ogawa, Kumiko
    Haishima, Yuji
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2018, 106 (08) : 2807 - 2814
  • [29] Round robin study to evaluate the Reconstructed Human Epidermis model as an in vitro skin irritation test for medical devices
    Coleman, Kelly
    De Jong, Wim
    Hoffmann, Sebastian
    Lee, Michelle
    Kandarova, Helena
    Letasiova, Silvia
    De La Fonteyne, Liset
    Pellevoisin, Christian
    Tornier, Carine
    Videau, Cristelle
    Haishima, Yuji
    Zdawczyk, Austin
    Turley, Audrey
    Willoughby, Jamin
    Bachelor, Michael
    Rollins, Beau
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S278 - S278
  • [30] Comparative assessment of 24-hr primary skin irritation test and human patch test data with in vitro skin irritation tests according to OECD Test Guideline 439 (for quasi-drugs in Japan)
    Sugiyama, Mariko
    Akita, Masaharu
    Alepee, Nathalie
    Fujishiro, Miyuki
    Hagino, Shigenobu
    Handa, Yuki
    Ikeda, Hidefumi
    Imai, Noriyasu
    Jitsukawa, Setsuko
    Katoh, Masakazu
    Kurihara, Koji
    Kyotani, Daiki
    Nomura, Shigeyuki
    Okamoto, Yuko
    Okumura, Hidenobu
    Omori, Takashi
    Sugibayashi, Kenji
    Todo, Hiroaki
    Toyoda, Akemi
    Ohno, Yasuo
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 43 (10-12): : 751 - 768