Fisher Information-Based Evaluation of Image Quality for Time-of-Flight PET

被引:26
|
作者
Vunckx, Kathleen [1 ]
Zhou, Lin [1 ]
Matej, Samuel [2 ]
Defrise, Michel [3 ]
Nuyts, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Nucl Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] VU Brussels, Dept Nucl Med, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Filtered backprojection (FBP); Fisher information; image quality; maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM); time-of-flight information in positron emission tomography (TOF PET); EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; EM ALGORITHM; RECONSTRUCTION; LIKELIHOOD; RESOLUTION; VARIANCE; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2009.2029098
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The use of time-of-flight (TOF) information during positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction has been found to improve the image quality. In this work we quantified this improvement using two existing methods: 1) a very simple analytical expression only valid for a central point in a large uniform disk source and 2) efficient analytical approximations for postfiltered maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction with a fixed target resolution, predicting the image quality in a pixel or in a small region of interest based on the Fisher information matrix. Using this latter method the weighting function for filtered backprojection reconstruction of TOF PET data proposed by C. Watson can be derived. The image quality was investigated at different locations in various software phantoms. Simplified as well as realistic phantoms, measured both with TOF PET systems and with a conventional PET system, were simulated. Since the time resolution of the system is not always accurately known, the effect on the image quality of using an inaccurate kernel during reconstruction was also examined with the Fisher information-based method. First, we confirmed with this method that the variance improvement in the center of a large uniform disk source is proportional to the disk diameter and inversely proportional to the time resolution. Next, image quality improvement was observed in all pixels, but in eccentric and high-count regions the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) increased less than in central and low- or medium-count regions. Finally, the CNR was seen to decrease when the time resolution was inaccurately modeled (too narrow or too wide) during reconstruction. Although the maximum CNR is not very sensitive to the time resolution error, using an inaccurate TOF kernel tends to introduce artifacts in the reconstructed image.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 321
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving time resolution in time-of-flight PET
    Conti, Maurizio
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2011, 648 : S194 - S198
  • [42] Clinical impact of time-of-flight PET
    Soussan, M.
    Galas, J-L
    Ouvrier, M-J
    Pop, G.
    Neuman, A.
    Weinmann, P.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2011, 35 (07): : 401 - 405
  • [43] Update on Time-of-Flight PET Imaging
    Surti, Suleman
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (01) : 98 - 105
  • [44] OPTIMIZATION OF DETECTORS FOR TIME-OF-FLIGHT PET
    Moszynski, Marek
    Szczesniak, Tomasz
    WORKSHOP ON TIMING DETECTORS: ELECTRONICS, MEDICAL AND PARTICLE PHYSICS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 4 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [45] Recent developments in time-of-flight PET
    Vandenberghe, S.
    Mikhaylova, E.
    D'Hoe, E.
    Mollet, P.
    Karp, J. S.
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [46] Attenuation Artifacts and Time-of-Flight PET
    Turkington, Timothy G.
    Wilson, Joshua M.
    2009 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 2997 - +
  • [47] Recent developments in time-of-flight PET
    S. Vandenberghe
    E. Mikhaylova
    E. D’Hoe
    P. Mollet
    J. S. Karp
    EJNMMI Physics, 3
  • [48] Characterization of a time-of-flight PET scanner based on lanthanum bromide
    Karp, J. S.
    Kuhn, A.
    Perkins, A. E.
    Surti, S.
    Werner, M. E.
    Daube-Witherspoon, M. E.
    Popescu, L.
    Vandenberghe, S.
    Muehllehner, G.
    2005 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 1919 - 1923
  • [49] TIME-OF-FLIGHT DEPTH IMAGE DENOISING USING PRIOR NOISE INFORMATION
    Edeler, T.
    Ohliger, K.
    Hussmann, S.
    Mertins, A.
    2010 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS (ICSP2010), VOLS I-III, 2010, : 119 - +
  • [50] EVALUATION OF FRACTIONAL ERRORS IN PIXELS AND REGIONS IN A TIME-OF-FLIGHT PET SCANNER
    CINOTTI, L
    LAVENNE, F
    LEBARS, D
    LANDAIS, P
    CAMPAGNOLO, R
    ROUSSET, O
    MAUGUIERE, F
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (08): : 1113 - 1120