Fisher Information-Based Evaluation of Image Quality for Time-of-Flight PET

被引:26
|
作者
Vunckx, Kathleen [1 ]
Zhou, Lin [1 ]
Matej, Samuel [2 ]
Defrise, Michel [3 ]
Nuyts, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Nucl Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] VU Brussels, Dept Nucl Med, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Filtered backprojection (FBP); Fisher information; image quality; maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM); time-of-flight information in positron emission tomography (TOF PET); EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; EM ALGORITHM; RECONSTRUCTION; LIKELIHOOD; RESOLUTION; VARIANCE; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2009.2029098
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The use of time-of-flight (TOF) information during positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction has been found to improve the image quality. In this work we quantified this improvement using two existing methods: 1) a very simple analytical expression only valid for a central point in a large uniform disk source and 2) efficient analytical approximations for postfiltered maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction with a fixed target resolution, predicting the image quality in a pixel or in a small region of interest based on the Fisher information matrix. Using this latter method the weighting function for filtered backprojection reconstruction of TOF PET data proposed by C. Watson can be derived. The image quality was investigated at different locations in various software phantoms. Simplified as well as realistic phantoms, measured both with TOF PET systems and with a conventional PET system, were simulated. Since the time resolution of the system is not always accurately known, the effect on the image quality of using an inaccurate kernel during reconstruction was also examined with the Fisher information-based method. First, we confirmed with this method that the variance improvement in the center of a large uniform disk source is proportional to the disk diameter and inversely proportional to the time resolution. Next, image quality improvement was observed in all pixels, but in eccentric and high-count regions the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) increased less than in central and low- or medium-count regions. Finally, the CNR was seen to decrease when the time resolution was inaccurately modeled (too narrow or too wide) during reconstruction. Although the maximum CNR is not very sensitive to the time resolution error, using an inaccurate TOF kernel tends to introduce artifacts in the reconstructed image.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 321
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gradient Information-Based Image Quality Metric
    Kim, Dong-O
    Han, Ho-Sung
    Park, Rae-Hong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2010, 56 (02) : 930 - 936
  • [22] Image Quality Evaluation of SiPM-Based and Standard PMT-based Time-Of-Flight Systems for Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging
    Caribe, P.
    Schramm, G.
    D'Asseler, Y.
    Bertin, H.
    Koole, M.
    Vandenberghe, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S712 - S713
  • [23] Fast Estimation of Image Variance for Time-of-flight PET Reconstruction
    Wang, Mengdie
    Hu, Guangshu
    El Fakhri, Georges
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Quanzheng
    2015 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2015,
  • [24] Time-of-flight PET image reconstruction using origin ensembles
    Wuelker, Christian
    Sitek, Arkadiusz
    Prevrhal, Sven
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (05): : 1919 - 1944
  • [25] Impact of Time-Of-Flight Image Reconstruction in PET Parametric Imaging
    Kotasidis, Fotis A.
    Mehranian, Abolfazl
    Zaidi, Habib
    2015 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2015,
  • [26] BANDWIDTH SELECTION FOR PET RECONSTRUCTION WITH AND WITHOUT TIME-OF-FLIGHT INFORMATION
    PAWITAN, Y
    OSULLIVAN, F
    LEWELLEN, TK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1994, 35 (05) : P188 - P188
  • [27] Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart?
    Wells, R. Glenn
    deKemp, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 413 - 416
  • [28] Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart?
    R. Glenn Wells
    Robert A. deKemp
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 413 - 416
  • [29] Impact of Time-Of-flight on reconstruction performance and image quality
    Vandenberghe, S.
    Lemahieu, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 : S238 - S238
  • [30] Advances in time-of-flight PET
    Surti, Suleman
    Karp, Joel S.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (01): : 12 - 22