Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management

被引:35
|
作者
Braden, JB
Johnston, DM
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Landscape Architecture, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(498)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Using benefits transfer methods, this paper assesses the downstream economic consequences of development designs that promote greater on-site water retention. It concludes that on-site retention provides many services that are conceptually distinct but empirically intertwined. Flood mitigation and water quality protection are the most important of these services. For residential properties, the economic value of those services is on the order of 0-5% of market value depending on the difference that retention makes to downstream flood exposure. For water quality improvements, the increases range up to 15% of market value for waterside residences where clarity of the water quality is greatly improved. The increases are much less for improvements that are less visible, properties that are not developed, and properties not adjacent to the watercourse. Our best estimate of total benefits to property owners is 2-5% of property value on average for all properties in the flood plain. The public sector realizes additional benefits through smaller bridges, culverts, and other drainage infrastructure and through increased aquifer recharge. Cities and industries may avoid costly upgrades to waste water treatment facilities if low flows increase. It is difficult to generalize about the economic value of the latter effects.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 505
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Survey of storm-water utilities available
    Benson, RB
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1996, 66 (07): : 29 - 29
  • [42] Storm-water treatment goes underground
    Roberts, B
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1996, 66 (07): : 56 - 57
  • [43] The transition to adaptive storm-water management: Learning from existing experiences in Italy and Southern France
    Gimenez-Maranges, Marc
    Pappalardo, Viviana
    La Rosa, Daniele
    Breuste, Juergen
    Hof, Angela
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 55
  • [44] Retention Capacity: A Metric to Link Stream Ecology and Storm-Water Management
    Walsh, Christopher J.
    Fletcher, Tim D.
    Ladson, Anthony R.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [45] Watershed Systems Analysis for Urban Storm-Water Management to Achieve Water Quality Goals
    McGarity, Arthur E.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (05) : 464 - 477
  • [46] THE DEVELOPMENT OF WATER-QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANS USING DATA FROM AUTOMATIC STORM-WATER MONITORING NETWORKS
    GRIZZARD, TJ
    HARTIGAN, JP
    RANDALL, CW
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 13 (08) : 95 - 102
  • [47] THE POLLUTIONAL EFFECTS OF STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS FROM COMBINED SEWERS
    PALMER, CL
    SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES, 1950, 22 (02): : 154 - 165
  • [48] Study on Storm-Water Management of Grassed Swales and Permeable Pavement Based on SWMM
    Xie, Jianguang
    Wu, Chenghao
    Li, Hua
    Chen, Gengtian
    WATER, 2017, 9 (11):
  • [49] Geographic information systems, decision support systems, and urban storm-water management
    Sample, DJ
    Heaney, JP
    Wright, LT
    Koustas, R
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2001, 127 (03): : 155 - 161
  • [50] Storm-water management: How much longer can permanent controls be avoided?
    Veal, SC
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1999, 15 (05) : 26 - 27