Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management

被引:35
|
作者
Braden, JB
Johnston, DM
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Landscape Architecture, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(498)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Using benefits transfer methods, this paper assesses the downstream economic consequences of development designs that promote greater on-site water retention. It concludes that on-site retention provides many services that are conceptually distinct but empirically intertwined. Flood mitigation and water quality protection are the most important of these services. For residential properties, the economic value of those services is on the order of 0-5% of market value depending on the difference that retention makes to downstream flood exposure. For water quality improvements, the increases range up to 15% of market value for waterside residences where clarity of the water quality is greatly improved. The increases are much less for improvements that are less visible, properties that are not developed, and properties not adjacent to the watercourse. Our best estimate of total benefits to property owners is 2-5% of property value on average for all properties in the flood plain. The public sector realizes additional benefits through smaller bridges, culverts, and other drainage infrastructure and through increased aquifer recharge. Cities and industries may avoid costly upgrades to waste water treatment facilities if low flows increase. It is difficult to generalize about the economic value of the latter effects.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 505
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thermal balance of on-stream storm-water management pond
    Van Buren, MA
    Watt, WE
    Marsalek, J
    Anderson, BC
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (06): : 509 - 517
  • [32] MODELING OF INFILTRATION FROM TRENCHES FOR STORM-WATER CONTROL
    DUCHENE, M
    MCBEAN, EA
    THOMSON, NR
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1994, 120 (03): : 276 - 293
  • [33] Modeling of infiltration from trenches for storm-water control
    Duchene, Michael, 1600, Publ by ASCE, New York, NY, United States (120):
  • [34] Evaluating Four Storm-Water Performance Metrics with a North Carolina Coastal Plain Storm-Water Wetland
    Lenhart, Hayes A.
    Hunt, William F., III
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 137 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [35] STORM-WATER POLLUTION-CONTROL - BEST MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    FINNEMORE, EJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION-ASCE, 1982, 108 (05): : 835 - 851
  • [36] MODELING SIDE-WEIR DIVERSION STRUCTURES FOR STORM-WATER MANAGEMENT
    JAMES, W
    MITRI, H
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1982, 9 (02) : 197 - 205
  • [37] Urban Storm-Water Quality Management: Centralized versus Source Control
    Freni, Gabriele
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Viviani, Gaspare
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (02) : 268 - 278
  • [38] Development of an Improved Approach for Selecting Storm-Water Best Management Practices
    Young, Kevin D.
    Dymond, Randel L.
    Kibler, David F.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2011, 137 (03): : 268 - 275
  • [39] Innovative Technologies for Storm-Water Management Programs in Small Urbanized Areas
    Aguilar, Marcus F.
    Dymond, Randel L.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (11)
  • [40] Simulation of the Performance of a Storm-Water BMP
    Wild, Thomas B.
    Davis, Allen P.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (12) : 1257 - 1267