The realized empirical distribution function of stochastic variance with application to goodness-of-fit testing

被引:7
|
作者
Christensen, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Thyrsgaard, Martin [1 ]
Veliyev, Bezirgen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ & Business Econ, CREATES, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
[2] Danish Finance Inst, Frederiksberg, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Empirical processes; Goodness-of-fit; High-frequency data; Microstructure noise; Pre-averaging; Realized variance; Stochastic volatility; KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST; MICROSTRUCTURE NOISE; INTEGRATED VOLATILITY; MODELS; TIME; MARKET; JUMPS; OPTIONS; RETURN; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We propose a nonparametric estimator of the empirical distribution function (EDF) of the latent spot variance of the log-price of a financial asset. We show that over a fixed time span our realized EDF (or REDF) - inferred from noisy high-frequency data - is consistent as the mesh of the observation grid goes to zero. In a double-asymptotic framework, with time also increasing to infinity, the REDF converges to the cumulative distribution function of volatility, if it exists. We exploit these results to construct some new goodness-of-fit tests for stochastic volatility models. In a Monte Carlo study, the REDF is found to be accurate over the entire support of volatility. This leads to goodness-of-fit tests that are both correctly sized and relatively powerful against common alternatives. In an empirical application, we recover the REDF from stock market high-frequency data. We inspect the goodness-of-fit of several two-parameter marginal distributions that are inherent in standard stochastic volatility models. The inverse Gaussian offers the best overall description of random equity variation, but the fit is less than perfect. This suggests an extra parameter (as available in, e.g., the generalized inverse Gaussian) is required to model stochastic variance. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 583
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A GOODNESS-OF-FIT TEST OF SIMPLE HYPOTHESES BASED ON THE EMPIRICAL CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION
    KOUTROUVELIS, IA
    BIOMETRIKA, 1980, 67 (01) : 238 - 240
  • [42] Goodness-of-fit tests for the Gompertz distribution
    Lenart, Adam
    Missov, Trifon I.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2016, 45 (10) : 2920 - 2937
  • [43] On goodness-of-fit tests for the Bell distribution
    Apostolos Batsidis
    María Dolores Jiménez-Gamero
    Artur J. Lemonte
    Metrika, 2020, 83 : 297 - 319
  • [44] Goodness-of-fit tests for Pareto distribution
    Gulati, Sneh
    Shapiro, Samuel
    STATISTICAL MODELS AND METHODS FOR BIOMEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, 2008, : 259 - 274
  • [45] On goodness-of-fit tests for the Bell distribution
    Batsidis, Apostolos
    Jimenez-Gamero, Maria Dolores
    Lemonte, Artur J.
    METRIKA, 2020, 83 (03) : 297 - 319
  • [46] On the conditional distribution of goodness-of-fit tests
    O'Reilly, F
    Gracia-Medrano, L
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2006, 35 (03) : 541 - 549
  • [47] Goodness-of-fit test for stochastic processes using even empirical moments statistic
    Maraj-Zygmat, Katarzyna
    Sikora, Grzegorz
    Pitera, Marcin
    Wylomanska, Agnieszka
    CHAOS, 2023, 33 (01)
  • [48] Tests for the goodness-of-fit of the Laplace distribution
    Chen, Colin
    Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation, 2002, 31 (01): : 159 - 174
  • [49] Stochastic volatility and the goodness-of-fit of the Heston model
    Daniel, G
    Joseph, NL
    Brée, DS
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2005, 5 (02) : 199 - 211
  • [50] A GOODNESS-OF-FIT TEST FOR STOCHASTIC BLOCK MODELS
    Lei, Jing
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2016, 44 (01): : 401 - 424