The realized empirical distribution function of stochastic variance with application to goodness-of-fit testing

被引:7
|
作者
Christensen, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Thyrsgaard, Martin [1 ]
Veliyev, Bezirgen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ & Business Econ, CREATES, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
[2] Danish Finance Inst, Frederiksberg, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Empirical processes; Goodness-of-fit; High-frequency data; Microstructure noise; Pre-averaging; Realized variance; Stochastic volatility; KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST; MICROSTRUCTURE NOISE; INTEGRATED VOLATILITY; MODELS; TIME; MARKET; JUMPS; OPTIONS; RETURN; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We propose a nonparametric estimator of the empirical distribution function (EDF) of the latent spot variance of the log-price of a financial asset. We show that over a fixed time span our realized EDF (or REDF) - inferred from noisy high-frequency data - is consistent as the mesh of the observation grid goes to zero. In a double-asymptotic framework, with time also increasing to infinity, the REDF converges to the cumulative distribution function of volatility, if it exists. We exploit these results to construct some new goodness-of-fit tests for stochastic volatility models. In a Monte Carlo study, the REDF is found to be accurate over the entire support of volatility. This leads to goodness-of-fit tests that are both correctly sized and relatively powerful against common alternatives. In an empirical application, we recover the REDF from stock market high-frequency data. We inspect the goodness-of-fit of several two-parameter marginal distributions that are inherent in standard stochastic volatility models. The inverse Gaussian offers the best overall description of random equity variation, but the fit is less than perfect. This suggests an extra parameter (as available in, e.g., the generalized inverse Gaussian) is required to model stochastic variance. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 583
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empirical likelihood as a goodness-of-fit measure
    Baggerly, KA
    BIOMETRIKA, 1998, 85 (03) : 535 - 547
  • [22] Goodness-of-fit testing for copulas: A distribution-free approach
    Can, Sami Umut
    Einmahl, John H. J.
    Laeven, Roger J. A.
    BERNOULLI, 2020, 26 (04) : 3163 - 3190
  • [23] Testing goodness-of-fit for Laplace distribution based on maximum entropy
    Choi, Byungjin
    Kim, Keeyoung
    STATISTICS, 2006, 40 (06) : 517 - 531
  • [24] Goodness-of-fit testing the error distribution in multivariate indirect regression
    Chown, Justin
    Bissantz, Nicolai
    Dette, Holger
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2019, 13 (02): : 2658 - 2685
  • [25] TESTING GOODNESS-OF-FIT VIA NONPARAMETRIC FUNCTION ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES
    EUBANK, RL
    HART, JD
    LARICCIA, VN
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1993, 22 (12) : 3327 - 3354
  • [26] Goodness-of-fit testing of a count time series’ marginal distribution
    Christian H. Weiß
    Metrika, 2018, 81 : 619 - 651
  • [27] Goodness-of-fit testing of a count time series' marginal distribution
    Weiss, Christian H.
    METRIKA, 2018, 81 (06) : 619 - 651
  • [28] A new approach to goodness-of-fit testing based on the integrated empirical process
    Henze, N
    Nikitin, YY
    JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS, 2000, 12 (03) : 391 - 416
  • [29] Permutation testing for goodness-of-fit and stochastic ordering with multivariate mixed variables
    Arboretti, Rosa
    Ceccato, Riccardo
    Salmaso, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2021, 91 (05) : 876 - 896
  • [30] Testing goodness-of-fit with interval data
    Vozhov, Stanislav S.
    Chimitova, Ekaterina V.
    VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-UPRAVLENIE VYCHISLITELNAJA TEHNIKA I INFORMATIKA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF CONTROL AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 34 (01): : 35 - 42