Validation of the Fusion Risk Score for Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fusion Procedures

被引:4
|
作者
Deogaonkar, Kedar [1 ]
Mehbod, Amir A. [1 ]
Dawson, John M. [1 ]
Transfeldt, Ensor E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Twin Cities Spine Ctr, 913 East 26th St,Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55404 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2018年 / 31卷 / 08期
关键词
spine fusion; lumbar spine; risk stratification; decision making; complications; comorbidities; invasiveness; OLDER-ADULTS; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000686
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the Fusion Risk Score (FRS) is valid for perioperative complications. Summary of Background Data: The FRS was previously formulated from a retrospective review of 364 fusion surgeries in patients over age 65. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical approach, levels, and osteotomies are incorporated in a weighted manner. This score correlated well with the risk of perioperative complications, operative time, estimated blood loss during surgery, and length of hospital stay. Materials and Methods: A new cohort of patients was studied. Subjects were 65 years old or older and had undergone routine elective thoracic or lumbar fusion surgery. The FRS was calculated for each subject to estimate risk (low, medium, or high) for perioperative complications. Actual incidences of major complications in the first 90 days after the surgery were noted and statistically compared with the predicted risk. The FRS was compared with intensive care unit admittance, estimated blood loss, operative time, and hospital length of stay to determine whether the score was predictive. Results: In total, 51% of our patients were at low risk (FRS, 1-3) for perioperative complications; 43% were at medium risk (FRS, 4-9); and 7% were at high risk (FRS, over 9). A total of 8% in the low-risk group, 23% in the medium-risk group, and 67% in the high-risk group actually developed significant perioperative complications. Medium-risk and high-risk patients experienced proportionally more perioperative complications than did low-risk patients; the difference was highly statistically significant. Conclusions: This study validated the association between the FRS and complications in the first 90 days after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery on the basis of patient and surgery characteristics. It also predicts the risk of intensive care unit admission, operative time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay.
引用
收藏
页码:E413 / E417
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine Introduction
    Groff, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [32] Surgical apgar score in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative spine diseases
    Ou, Chien-Yu
    Hsu, Shih-Yuan
    Huang, Jian-Hao
    Huang, Yu-Hua
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 152 : 63 - 67
  • [33] Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: Lumbar fusion for stenosis without spondylolisthesis
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Watters, William C., III
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Dailey, Andrew T.
    Choudhri, Tanvir F.
    Eck, Jason C.
    Sharan, Alok
    Groff, Michael W.
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [34] Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion
    Resnick, DK
    Choudhri, TF
    Dailey, AT
    Groff, MW
    Khoo, L
    Matz, PG
    Mummaneni, P
    Watters, WC
    Wang, J
    Walters, BC
    Hadley, MN
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (06) : 716 - 724
  • [35] Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: Lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Dailey, Andrew T.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Watters, William C., III
    Groff, Michael W.
    Choudhri, Tanvir F.
    Eck, Jason C.
    Sharan, Alok
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [36] A biomechanical comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine
    Chen, CS
    Cheng, CK
    Liu, CL
    Simmons, ED
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2002, 15 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [37] Lumbar spine fusion: what is the evidence?
    Harris, Ian A.
    Traeger, Adrian
    Stanford, Ralph
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 48 (12) : 1430 - 1434
  • [38] Fusion of the lumbar spine - A consideration of the indications
    Krismer, M
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (06): : 783 - 794
  • [39] ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION OF THE LUMBAR SPINE
    RAUGSTAD, TS
    HARBO, K
    HOGBERG, A
    SKEIE, S
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 53 (04): : 561 - 565
  • [40] Anterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine
    Wimmer, C
    Krismer, M
    Gluch, H
    Sterzinger, W
    Ogon, M
    ORTHOPADE, 1997, 26 (06): : 563 - 567