Validation of the Fusion Risk Score for Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fusion Procedures

被引:4
|
作者
Deogaonkar, Kedar [1 ]
Mehbod, Amir A. [1 ]
Dawson, John M. [1 ]
Transfeldt, Ensor E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Twin Cities Spine Ctr, 913 East 26th St,Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55404 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2018年 / 31卷 / 08期
关键词
spine fusion; lumbar spine; risk stratification; decision making; complications; comorbidities; invasiveness; OLDER-ADULTS; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000686
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the Fusion Risk Score (FRS) is valid for perioperative complications. Summary of Background Data: The FRS was previously formulated from a retrospective review of 364 fusion surgeries in patients over age 65. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical approach, levels, and osteotomies are incorporated in a weighted manner. This score correlated well with the risk of perioperative complications, operative time, estimated blood loss during surgery, and length of hospital stay. Materials and Methods: A new cohort of patients was studied. Subjects were 65 years old or older and had undergone routine elective thoracic or lumbar fusion surgery. The FRS was calculated for each subject to estimate risk (low, medium, or high) for perioperative complications. Actual incidences of major complications in the first 90 days after the surgery were noted and statistically compared with the predicted risk. The FRS was compared with intensive care unit admittance, estimated blood loss, operative time, and hospital length of stay to determine whether the score was predictive. Results: In total, 51% of our patients were at low risk (FRS, 1-3) for perioperative complications; 43% were at medium risk (FRS, 4-9); and 7% were at high risk (FRS, over 9). A total of 8% in the low-risk group, 23% in the medium-risk group, and 67% in the high-risk group actually developed significant perioperative complications. Medium-risk and high-risk patients experienced proportionally more perioperative complications than did low-risk patients; the difference was highly statistically significant. Conclusions: This study validated the association between the FRS and complications in the first 90 days after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery on the basis of patient and surgery characteristics. It also predicts the risk of intensive care unit admission, operative time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay.
引用
收藏
页码:E413 / E417
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: bone growth stimulators and lumbar fusion
    Resnick, DK
    Choudhri, TF
    Dailey, AT
    Groff, MW
    Khoo, L
    Matz, PG
    Mummaneni, P
    Watters, WC
    Wang, J
    Walters, BC
    Hadley, MN
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (06): : 737 - 740
  • [22] Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: Electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion
    Sharan, Alok
    Groff, Michael W.
    Dailey, Andrew T.
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Watters, William C., III
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Choudhri, Tanvir F.
    Eck, Jason C.
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 102 - 105
  • [23] Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy
    Resnick, DK
    Choudhri, TF
    Dailey, AT
    Groff, MW
    Khoo, L
    Matz, PG
    Mummaneni, P
    Watters, WC
    Wang, J
    Walters, BC
    Hadley, MN
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (06) : 673 - 678
  • [24] Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    Eck, Jason C.
    Groff, Michael W.
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Watters, William C., III
    Dailey, Andrew T.
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Choudhri, Tanvir F.
    Sharan, Alok
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [25] HARRINGTON INSTRUMENTATION AND SPINE FUSION FOR UNSTABLE FRACTURES AND FRACTURE-DISLOCATIONS OF THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE
    FLESCH, JR
    LEIDER, LL
    ERICKSON, DL
    CHOU, SN
    BRADFORD, DS
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (02): : 143 - 153
  • [26] VENTRAL INTERBODY FUSION OF THE THORACIC AND LUMBAR PARTS OF THE SPINE - INDICATION, TECHNIQUE, RESULTS
    ZIPPEL, H
    HAHNEL, H
    DEUTSCHE GESUNDHEITSWESEN-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE MEDIZIN, 1983, 38 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [27] Bone Fusion Rate in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine After Laminoplasty With Laminar Screws
    Yang, Seung Heon
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Park, Sung Bae
    Sohn, Seil
    Lee, Sungjoon
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (22) : E1325 - E1330
  • [28] Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures
    Lopez, Cesar D.
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Lombardi, Joseph M.
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Saifi, Comron
    Dyrszka, Marc D.
    Sardar, Zeeshan M.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (10): : 1586 - 1594
  • [29] Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures
    Martin, Brook I.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Comstock, Bryan A.
    Gray, Darryl T.
    Kreuter, William
    Deyo, Richard A.
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (03) : 382 - 387
  • [30] Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion
    Resnick, DK
    Choudhri, TF
    Dailey, AT
    Groff, MW
    Khoo, L
    Matz, PG
    Mummaneni, P
    Watters, WC
    Wang, J
    Walters, BC
    Hadley, MN
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (06): : 653 - 657