Visual Acuity Reporting in Clinical Research Publications

被引:20
|
作者
Tsou, Brittany C. [1 ]
Bressler, Neil M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0932
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Visual acuity results in publications typically are reported in Snellen or non-Snellen formats or both. A study in 2011 suggested that many ophthalmologists do not understand non-Snellen formats, such as logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores. As a result, some journals, since at least 2013, have instructed authors to provide approximate Snellen equivalents next to non-Snellen visual acuity values. OBJECTIVE To evaluate how authors currently report visual acuity and whether they provide Snellen equivalents when their reports include non-Snellen formats. DESIGN From November 21, 2016, through December 14, 2016, one reviewer evaluated visual acuity reporting among all articles published in 4 ophthalmology clinical journals from November 2015 through October 2016, including 3 of 4 journals that instructed authors to provide Snellen equivalents for visual acuity reported in non-Snellen formats. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Frequency of formats of visual acuity reporting and frequency of providing Snellen equivalents when non-Snellen formats are given. RESULTS The 4 journals reviewed had the second, fourth, fifth, and ninth highest impact factors for ophthalmology journals in 2015. Of 1881 articles reviewed, 807 (42.9%) provided a visual acuity measurement. Of these, 396 (49.1%) used only a Snellen format; 411 (50.9%) used a non-Snellen format. Among those using a non-Snellen format, 145 (35.3%) provided a Snellen equivalent while 266 (64.7%) provided only a non-Snellen format. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE More than half of all articles in 4 ophthalmology clinical journals fail to provide a Snellen equivalent when visual acuity is not in a Snellen format. Since many US ophthalmologists may not comprehend non-Snellen formats easily, these data suggest that editors and publishing staff should encourage authors to provide Snellen equivalents whenever visual acuity data are reported in a non-Snellen format to improve ease of understanding visual acuity measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 653
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions
    Eichenberger, Martina
    Perrin, Philippe
    Neuhaus, Klaus W.
    Bringolf, Ueli
    Lussi, Adrian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (03) : 725 - 729
  • [42] Visual acuity by responder status in the IVAN clinical trial
    Lotery, Andrew
    Scott, Lauren
    Harding, Simon P.
    Reeves, Barney
    Rogers, Chris
    Chakravarthy, Usha
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [43] Clinical use of an objective nystagmographic visual acuity test
    Gräf, M
    Kaufmann, H
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S962 - S962
  • [44] Estimating visual acuity without a visual acuity chart
    Wu, Yueh-Hsun
    Yu, Deyue
    Goldstein, Judith E.
    Kwon, MiYoung
    Watson, Emily Catherine
    Waked, Luc
    Gobeille, Micaela R.
    DeCarlo, Dawn K.
    Gage, Rachel
    Wang, Chun
    Legge, Gordon E.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [45] Applications of dynamic visual acuity test in clinical ophthalmology
    Ting-Yi Wu
    Yue-Xin Wang
    Xue-Min Li
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, (11) : 1771 - 1778
  • [46] INSTRUMENTS FOR PREDICTING VISUAL-ACUITY - A CLINICAL COMPARISON
    SPURNY, RC
    ZALDIVAR, R
    BELCHER, D
    SIMMONS, RJ
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1986, 104 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [47] Guidelines for the reporting of clinical research
    Harvey, L. A.
    SPINAL CORD, 2014, 52 (11) : 787 - 787
  • [48] Conduct and reporting of clinical research
    Liu, JLY
    Altman, DG
    SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5719) : 201 - 202
  • [49] Improving the reporting of clinical research
    Boutron, I.
    Ravaud, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (05) : 449 - 450
  • [50] Guidelines for the reporting of clinical research
    L A Harvey
    Spinal Cord, 2014, 52 : 787 - 787