Visual Acuity Reporting in Clinical Research Publications

被引:20
|
作者
Tsou, Brittany C. [1 ]
Bressler, Neil M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0932
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Visual acuity results in publications typically are reported in Snellen or non-Snellen formats or both. A study in 2011 suggested that many ophthalmologists do not understand non-Snellen formats, such as logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores. As a result, some journals, since at least 2013, have instructed authors to provide approximate Snellen equivalents next to non-Snellen visual acuity values. OBJECTIVE To evaluate how authors currently report visual acuity and whether they provide Snellen equivalents when their reports include non-Snellen formats. DESIGN From November 21, 2016, through December 14, 2016, one reviewer evaluated visual acuity reporting among all articles published in 4 ophthalmology clinical journals from November 2015 through October 2016, including 3 of 4 journals that instructed authors to provide Snellen equivalents for visual acuity reported in non-Snellen formats. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Frequency of formats of visual acuity reporting and frequency of providing Snellen equivalents when non-Snellen formats are given. RESULTS The 4 journals reviewed had the second, fourth, fifth, and ninth highest impact factors for ophthalmology journals in 2015. Of 1881 articles reviewed, 807 (42.9%) provided a visual acuity measurement. Of these, 396 (49.1%) used only a Snellen format; 411 (50.9%) used a non-Snellen format. Among those using a non-Snellen format, 145 (35.3%) provided a Snellen equivalent while 266 (64.7%) provided only a non-Snellen format. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE More than half of all articles in 4 ophthalmology clinical journals fail to provide a Snellen equivalent when visual acuity is not in a Snellen format. Since many US ophthalmologists may not comprehend non-Snellen formats easily, these data suggest that editors and publishing staff should encourage authors to provide Snellen equivalents whenever visual acuity data are reported in a non-Snellen format to improve ease of understanding visual acuity measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 653
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REPORTING THE VISUAL-ACUITY OF GROUPS - THE RELATION AMONG ALTERNATE MEASURES
    COREN, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1987, 64 (12): : 897 - 900
  • [22] A clinical test of dynamic visual acuity for children
    Rine, RM
    Braswell, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 67 (11) : 1195 - 1201
  • [23] AUTOMATED CLINICAL VISUAL-ACUITY TESTING
    TIMBERLAKE, GT
    MAINSTER, MA
    SCHEPENS, CL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1980, 90 (03) : 369 - 373
  • [24] Predicting Clinical Visual Acuity of Presbyopia Treatments
    Schwiegerling, Jim
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 26 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [25] A clinical lecture on the diagnostic value of the visual acuity
    Parsons, JH
    LANCET, 1907, 2 : 1513 - 1514
  • [26] Visual acuity of dentists in their respective clinical conditions
    Perrin, Philippe
    Ramseyer, Simon T.
    Eichenberger, Martina
    Lussi, Adrian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 18 (09) : 2055 - 2058
  • [27] Feasibility of quantitative Visual Acuity analysis for enriching Visual Acuity data collected in retina clinical trials
    Katz, Raviv
    Vingopoulos, Filippos
    Bajaj, Rohan
    Lesmes, Luis
    Miller, John
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [28] ACUITY CARDS FOR VISUAL-ACUITY ASSESSMENT OF INFANTS AND CHILDREN IN CLINICAL SETTINGS
    SEBRIS, SL
    DOBSON, V
    MCDONALD, M
    TELLER, DY
    CLINICAL VISION SCIENCES, 1987, 2 (01): : 45 - &
  • [29] Quantifying visual acuity for pre-clinical testing of visual prostheses
    Spencer, Martin
    Kameneva, Tatiana
    Grayden, David B.
    Burkitt, Anthony N.
    Meffin, Hamish
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [30] Survey Research Reporting in Radiology Publications: A Review of 2017 to 2018
    Shankar, Prasad R.
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (10) : 1378 - 1384