Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?

被引:3
|
作者
Richter, Lee A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Amy J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boileau, Jenine E. [4 ]
Janni, Megan [4 ]
Desale, Sameer [5 ]
Iglesia, Cheryl B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] MedStarWashington Hosp Ctr, Natl Ctr Adv Pelv Surg, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Washington, DC USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[5] MedStar Hlth Res Inst, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
outcomes; POPQ; prolapse; vaginal surgery; ANTERIOR;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The best predictors for postoperative anatomic apical success after transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the preoperative D point and anatomic outcomes for apical prolapse after 1 year. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included subjects undergoing transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension from 2008 through 2013 who had at least 1 year follow-up. Demographic information, preoperative and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) examination measurements, need for retreatment or repeat surgery, and assessment of pelvic floor symptoms were reviewed. Postoperative apical success was defined as C point descent no more than one third into the vaginal canal. Results: One hundred twenty-five women met inclusion criteria and had follow-up at 1 year or more. Concomitant procedures included anterior/posterior repair and midurethral sling. Mean follow-up time was 22.8 months (range, 12-63 months). At last follow-up, 96% met criteria for apical success. A more negative preoperative D point was significantly related to improved postoperative apical support, with each 1-cm descent in preoperative D point resulting in a postoperative C point that was 0.21 cm lower (P = 0.0005). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, a "cut-off" D point value of -4.25 (sensitivity, 0.8; specificity, 0.65) was determined to be a predictor of postoperative apical success at 1 year or more. Conclusions: The preoperative D point correlates with postoperative apical support, and a clinically meaningful relationship exists between the preoperative D point and anatomic apical success.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 150
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does pelvic organ prolapse quantification exam predict urethral mobility in stages 0 and I prolapse?
    Noblett, K
    Lane, FL
    Driskill, CS
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 16 (04) : 268 - 271
  • [42] Estrogen and Androgen Receptor Status in Uterosacral Ligaments of Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stratified by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Histology Quantification System
    Orlicky, David J.
    Smith, E. Erin
    Bok, Rachel
    Guess, Marsha K.
    Rascoff, Lauren G.
    Arruda, Jaime S.
    Hutchinson-Colas, Juana A.
    Johnson, Joshua
    Connell, Kathleen A.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (12) : 3495 - 3506
  • [43] Estrogen and Androgen Receptor Status in Uterosacral Ligaments of Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stratified by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Histology Quantification System
    David J. Orlicky
    E. Erin Smith
    Rachel Bok
    Marsha K. Guess
    Lauren G. Rascoff
    Jaime S. Arruda
    Juana A. Hutchinson-Colas
    Joshua Johnson
    Kathleen A. Connell
    Reproductive Sciences, 2023, 30 : 3495 - 3506
  • [44] Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse
    Wang, Qi
    Wu, Nengxiu
    Li, Ying
    Lin, Chaoqin
    Xu, Ying
    Chen, Xianjing
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (04) : 1273 - 1282
  • [45] Proteomics of Uterosacral Ligament Connective Tissue from Women with and without Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Li, Xiang-Juan
    Pan, Hai-Tao
    Chen, Juan-Juan
    Fu, Yi-Bin
    Fang, Min
    He, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Tao
    Ding, Hai-Gang
    Yu, Bin
    Cheng, Yi
    Tan, Ya-Jing
    Zhao, Fa-Lin
    Morse, Abraham N.
    Huang, He-Feng
    PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 13 (04)
  • [46] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament colpopexy for apical support in addition to hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Nishimura, Kazuaki
    Yoshimura, Kazuaki
    Hoshino, Kaori
    Myoga, Mai
    Kubo, Tatsuhiko
    Hachisuga, Toru
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (08) : 1522 - 1529
  • [47] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [48] Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: A minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse
    Medina, Carlos
    Takacs, Peter
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (05) : 472 - 475
  • [49] Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
    Douligeris, Athanasios
    Kathopoulis, Nikolaos
    Zachariou, Eleftherios
    Mortaki, Anastasia
    Zacharakis, Dimitrios
    Kypriotis, Konstantinos
    Chatzipapas, Ioannis
    Protopapas, Athanasios
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 477 - 487
  • [50] LAPAROSCOPIC HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Panico, Giovanni
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Lombisani, Andrea
    Mastrovito, Sara
    Arcieri, Martina
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 : S23 - S24