Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?

被引:3
|
作者
Richter, Lee A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Amy J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boileau, Jenine E. [4 ]
Janni, Megan [4 ]
Desale, Sameer [5 ]
Iglesia, Cheryl B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] MedStarWashington Hosp Ctr, Natl Ctr Adv Pelv Surg, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Washington, DC USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[5] MedStar Hlth Res Inst, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Washington, DC USA
来源
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2016年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词
outcomes; POPQ; prolapse; vaginal surgery; ANTERIOR;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The best predictors for postoperative anatomic apical success after transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the preoperative D point and anatomic outcomes for apical prolapse after 1 year. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included subjects undergoing transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension from 2008 through 2013 who had at least 1 year follow-up. Demographic information, preoperative and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) examination measurements, need for retreatment or repeat surgery, and assessment of pelvic floor symptoms were reviewed. Postoperative apical success was defined as C point descent no more than one third into the vaginal canal. Results: One hundred twenty-five women met inclusion criteria and had follow-up at 1 year or more. Concomitant procedures included anterior/posterior repair and midurethral sling. Mean follow-up time was 22.8 months (range, 12-63 months). At last follow-up, 96% met criteria for apical success. A more negative preoperative D point was significantly related to improved postoperative apical support, with each 1-cm descent in preoperative D point resulting in a postoperative C point that was 0.21 cm lower (P = 0.0005). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, a "cut-off" D point value of -4.25 (sensitivity, 0.8; specificity, 0.65) was determined to be a predictor of postoperative apical success at 1 year or more. Conclusions: The preoperative D point correlates with postoperative apical support, and a clinically meaningful relationship exists between the preoperative D point and anatomic apical success.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 150
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study
    Sanses, Tatiana V. D.
    Shahryarinejad, Azin
    Molden, Stephanie
    Hoskey, Kay A.
    Abbasy, Shameem
    Patterson, Danielle
    Saks, Emily K.
    LeBrun, Emily E. Weber
    Gamble, Tondalaya L.
    King, Virginia G.
    Nguyen, Aimee L.
    Abed, Husam
    Young, Stephen B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 519.e1 - 519.e8
  • [32] OUTCOMES OF UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION OF VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE POST HYSTERECTOMY
    Carey, M. O.
    Agnew, G. J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S342 - S342
  • [33] Proteomic Analysis of the Uterosacral Ligament in Postmenopausal Women with and without Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Sun, Zhi-Jing
    Zhu, Lan
    Lang, Jing-He
    Wang, Zhao
    Liang, Shuo
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (23) : 3191 - 3196
  • [34] Proteomic Analysis of the Uterosacral Ligament in Postmenopausal Women with and without Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Sun Zhi-Jing
    Zhu Lan
    Lang Jing-He
    Wang Zhao
    Liang Shuo
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (23) : 3191 - 3196
  • [35] Using the novel pelvic organ prolapse histologic quantification system to identify phenotypes in uterosacral ligaments in women with pelvic organ prolapse
    Orlicky, David J.
    Guess, Marsha K.
    Bales, Elise S.
    Rascoff, Lauren G.
    Arruda, Jaime S.
    Hutchinson-Colas, Juana A.
    Johnson, Joshua
    Connell, Kathleen A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (01)
  • [36] Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial
    Martins, Sergio Brasileiro
    Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
    Takano, Claudia Cristina
    Marquini, Gisele Vissoci
    de Oliveira, Leticia Maria
    Martins Jr, Paulo Cezar Feldner
    Dias, Marcia Maria
    Girao, Manoel Joao Batista Castello
    Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2023, 45 (10): : E584 - E593
  • [37] EFFECTIVENESS OF 9 YEARS' FOLLOW-UP OF TRANSVAGINAL HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION FOR ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Lu, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S56 - S57
  • [38] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yuanzhuo
    Peng, Liao
    Zhang, Jie
    Shen, Hong
    Luo, Deyi
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 133 - 139
  • [39] IS THE HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION SUBSEQUENT TO VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY SUPERIOR TO A SIMPLIFIED MCCALL PROCEDURE IN PATIENTS WITH PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE?
    Litjens, R.
    Rijsdijk, O.
    Link, G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S200 - S201
  • [40] Does pelvic organ prolapse quantification exam predict urethral mobility in stages 0 and I prolapse?
    Karen Noblett
    Felicia L. Lane
    Christopher S. Driskill
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2005, 16 : 268 - 271