Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?

被引:3
|
作者
Richter, Lee A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Amy J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boileau, Jenine E. [4 ]
Janni, Megan [4 ]
Desale, Sameer [5 ]
Iglesia, Cheryl B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] MedStarWashington Hosp Ctr, Natl Ctr Adv Pelv Surg, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Washington, DC USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[5] MedStar Hlth Res Inst, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
outcomes; POPQ; prolapse; vaginal surgery; ANTERIOR;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000245
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The best predictors for postoperative anatomic apical success after transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the preoperative D point and anatomic outcomes for apical prolapse after 1 year. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included subjects undergoing transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension from 2008 through 2013 who had at least 1 year follow-up. Demographic information, preoperative and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) examination measurements, need for retreatment or repeat surgery, and assessment of pelvic floor symptoms were reviewed. Postoperative apical success was defined as C point descent no more than one third into the vaginal canal. Results: One hundred twenty-five women met inclusion criteria and had follow-up at 1 year or more. Concomitant procedures included anterior/posterior repair and midurethral sling. Mean follow-up time was 22.8 months (range, 12-63 months). At last follow-up, 96% met criteria for apical success. A more negative preoperative D point was significantly related to improved postoperative apical support, with each 1-cm descent in preoperative D point resulting in a postoperative C point that was 0.21 cm lower (P = 0.0005). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, a "cut-off" D point value of -4.25 (sensitivity, 0.8; specificity, 0.65) was determined to be a predictor of postoperative apical success at 1 year or more. Conclusions: The preoperative D point correlates with postoperative apical support, and a clinically meaningful relationship exists between the preoperative D point and anatomic apical success.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 150
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DOES PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE QUANTIFICATION EXAM (POPQ) D-POINT PREDICT UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION OUTCOMES?
    Richter, Lee
    Park, Amy
    Boileau, Jenine
    Janni, Megan
    Desale, Sameer
    Iglesia, Cheryl
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2015, 34 : S34 - S35
  • [2] Association of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination D point with uterosacral ligament suspension outcomes: the "OPTIMAL" D point
    Richter, Lee A.
    Bradley, Sarah E.
    Desale, Sameer
    Richter, Holly E.
    Park, Amy J.
    Iglesia, Cheryl B.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (08) : 2179 - 2184
  • [3] Association of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination D point with uterosacral ligament suspension outcomes: the “OPTIMAL” D point
    Lee A. Richter
    Sarah E. Bradley
    Sameer Desale
    Holly E. Richter
    Amy J. Park
    Cheryl B. Iglesia
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 2179 - 2184
  • [4] THE "OPTIMAL" D POINT: ASSOCIATION OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE QUANTIFICATION (POPQ) EXAMINATION D POINT WITH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION OUTCOMES
    Richter, L. A.
    Bradley, S. E.
    Desale, S.
    Richter, H. E.
    Park, A.
    Iglesia, C. B.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S70 - S71
  • [5] Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage
    Lavelle, Erin Seifert
    Giugale, Lauren E.
    Winger, Daniel G.
    Wang, Li
    Carter-Brooks, Charelle M.
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : 116.e1 - 116.e5
  • [6] Outcomes after vaginal versus robot assisted uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse repair
    Tillett, A. L.
    Karpman, M. B.
    Ramaseshan, A. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (03) : S848 - S848
  • [8] Supramolecular Fibrous Hydrogel Augmentation of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Miller, Beverly
    Wolfe, Wiley
    Gentry, James L.
    Grewal, M. Gregory
    Highley, Christopher B.
    De Vita, Raffaella
    Vaughan, Monique H.
    Caliari, Steven R.
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2023, 12 (22)
  • [9] Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Smith, Benjamin C.
    Crisp, Catrina C.
    Kleeman, Steven D.
    Yook, Eunsun
    Pauls, Rachel N.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (02): : 93 - 98
  • [10] EFFECTIVENESS OF VAGINAL HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION FOR TREATMENT OF RECURRENT PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Lu, Y.
    Shen, W.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S275 - S276