Post-treatment Follow-up, Imaging, and Outcome Scores: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

被引:17
|
作者
van Dijk, Pim A. D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Murawski, Christopher D. [5 ]
Hunt, Kenneth J. [6 ]
Andrews, Carol L. [7 ]
Longo, Umile Giuseppe [8 ]
McCollum, Graham [9 ]
Simpson, Helene [10 ]
Sofka, Carolyn M. [11 ]
Yoshimura, Ichiro [12 ]
Karlsson, Jon [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Orthopaed Res Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Ctr Evidence Based Sports Med ACES, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] ACHSS, AMC VUmc IOC Res Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Div Musculoskeletal Imaging, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Campus Biomed Rome, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Rome, Italy
[9] Univ Cape Town, UCT Private Acad Hosp, Kingsbury Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cape Town, South Africa
[10] Sports Injuries Ctr, Cape Town, South Africa
[11] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Radiol & Imaging, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[12] Fukuoka Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Fukuoka, Japan
[13] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
OCL; follow-up; PROMs; outcome score; post-treatment; OSTEOCHONDRAL LESIONS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; TALUS; MICROFRACTURE; TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1177/1071100718781861
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on Post-treatment Follow-up, Imaging and Outcome Scores developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 12 statements on Post-treatment Follow-up, Imaging, and Outcome Scores reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. All 12 statements reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with post-treatment follow-up, imaging, and outcome scores after management of a cartilage injury of the ankle in the general population. Moreover, healing, rehabilitation, and final outcomes can be optimized for the individual patient.
引用
收藏
页码:68S / 73S
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AGENCY DIFFERENCES IN POST-TREATMENT OUTCOMES - A FOLLOW-UP OF DRUG-ABUSE TREATMENT CLIENTS
    JOE, GW
    SINGH, BK
    LEHMAN, W
    SIMPSON, DD
    SELLS, SB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1983, 18 (04): : 523 - 538
  • [42] Evaluation of a post-treatment follow-up program in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
    Peisker, Andre
    Raschke, Gregor Franziskus
    Guentsch, Arndt
    Luepke, Paul
    Roshanghias, Korosh
    Schultze-Mosgau, Stefan
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (01) : 135 - 141
  • [43] ADDICT DEATH RATES DURING A 4-YEAR POST-TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP
    JOE, GW
    LEHMAN, W
    SIMPSON, DD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1982, 72 (07) : 703 - 709
  • [44] Post-treatment follow-up procedures in cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy
    Seiji Mabuchi
    Fumiaki Isohashi
    Shintaro Maruoka
    Takeshi Hisamatsu
    Tsuyoshi Takiuchi
    Yasuo Yoshioka
    Tadashi Kimura
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 179 - 185
  • [45] EFFICACY OF TREATING NEUROTIC PATIENTS AND POSSIBILITY OF FORECASTING IT DURING POST-TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP
    FEDOROV, AP
    ZHURNAL NEVROPATOLOGII I PSIKHIATRII IMENI S S KORSAKOVA, 1982, 82 (11): : 1669 - 1673
  • [46] Evaluation of a post-treatment follow-up program in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
    Andre Peisker
    Gregor Franziskus Raschke
    Arndt Guentsch
    Paul Luepke
    Korosh Roshanghias
    Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2017, 21 : 135 - 141
  • [47] Importance of post-treatment follow-up to secure sufficient eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori
    Roug, Stine
    Madsen, Lone Galmstrup
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 59 (12):
  • [48] Cephalometric appraisal of post-treatment tooth eruption: a 20 year follow-up study
    Poelmans, Simon
    Clijmans, Maite
    Fieuws, Steffen
    Willems, Guy
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [49] Post-treatment follow-up procedures in cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy
    Mabuchi, Seiji
    Isohashi, Fumiaki
    Maruoka, Shintaro
    Hisamatsu, Takeshi
    Takiuchi, Tsuyoshi
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Kimura, Tadashi
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (01) : 179 - 185
  • [50] Analysis of patients' preferences for post-treatment clinical follow-up in head and neck cancers
    Pistillo, P.
    Favales, F.
    Villa, C.
    Alfieri, S.
    Bossi, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27