Post-treatment Follow-up, Imaging, and Outcome Scores: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

被引:17
|
作者
van Dijk, Pim A. D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Murawski, Christopher D. [5 ]
Hunt, Kenneth J. [6 ]
Andrews, Carol L. [7 ]
Longo, Umile Giuseppe [8 ]
McCollum, Graham [9 ]
Simpson, Helene [10 ]
Sofka, Carolyn M. [11 ]
Yoshimura, Ichiro [12 ]
Karlsson, Jon [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Orthopaed Res Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Ctr Evidence Based Sports Med ACES, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] ACHSS, AMC VUmc IOC Res Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Div Musculoskeletal Imaging, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Campus Biomed Rome, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Rome, Italy
[9] Univ Cape Town, UCT Private Acad Hosp, Kingsbury Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cape Town, South Africa
[10] Sports Injuries Ctr, Cape Town, South Africa
[11] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Radiol & Imaging, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[12] Fukuoka Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Fukuoka, Japan
[13] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
OCL; follow-up; PROMs; outcome score; post-treatment; OSTEOCHONDRAL LESIONS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; TALUS; MICROFRACTURE; TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1177/1071100718781861
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on Post-treatment Follow-up, Imaging and Outcome Scores developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 12 statements on Post-treatment Follow-up, Imaging, and Outcome Scores reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. All 12 statements reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with post-treatment follow-up, imaging, and outcome scores after management of a cartilage injury of the ankle in the general population. Moreover, healing, rehabilitation, and final outcomes can be optimized for the individual patient.
引用
收藏
页码:68S / 73S
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving post-treatment follow-up of HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancers
    Mirghani, H.
    Blanchard, P.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2025, 142 (02) : 59 - 60
  • [32] Utility of cardiac MRI for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of lupus myocarditis
    Farhood Saremi
    Oganes Ashikyan
    Rajeev Saggar
    John Vu
    Molly E. Nunez
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2007, 23 : 347 - 352
  • [33] ACR Appropriateness Criteria Post-Treatment Follow-Up of Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Casalino, David D.
    Remer, Erick M.
    Bishoff, Jay T.
    Coursey, Courtney A.
    Dighe, Manjiri
    Harvin, Howard J.
    Heilbrun, Marta E.
    Majd, Massoud
    Nikolaidis, Paul
    Preminger, Glenn M.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Sheth, Sheila
    Vikram, Raghunandan
    Weinfeld, Robert M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (05) : 443 - 449
  • [34] Factors that contribute to post-treatment follow-up care for survivors of childhood cancer
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    Schwartz, Lisa A.
    Szabo, Margo M.
    Hussey, Heather M.
    Bunin, Greta R.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2012, 6 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [35] FOLLOW-UP SURVEY OF POST-TREATMENT ADAPTATION OF FORMER DAY HOSPITAL PATIENTS
    ORBACH, CE
    ALDRIGE, EE
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL NURSING AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, 1973, 11 (06) : 5 - 13
  • [36] POST-TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP OF STAGE-II NONSEMINOMATOUS TESTICULAR CANCER
    HIGGINS, MC
    TORTI, FM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 1983, 24 (MAR): : 129 - 129
  • [37] Factors that contribute to post-treatment follow-up care for survivors of childhood cancer
    Lamia P. Barakat
    Lisa A. Schwartz
    Margo M. Szabo
    Heather M. Hussey
    Greta R. Bunin
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2012, 6 : 155 - 162
  • [38] POST-TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP OF STAGE-II NONSEMINOMATOUS TESTICULAR CANCER
    HIGGINS, MC
    MARTON, KI
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 31 (01): : A67 - A67
  • [39] Utility of cardiac MRI for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of lupus myocarditis
    Saremi, Farhood
    Ashikyan, Oganes
    Saggar, Rajeev
    Vu, John
    Nunez, Molly E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2007, 23 (03): : 347 - 352
  • [40] Imaging recommendations for soft-tissue sarcomas: model guidelines from diagnosis to post-treatment follow-up
    Hussein, M.
    Gupta, H.
    Ahuja, A.
    Thaker, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (12) : 881 - 891