Photon dose calculation analysis of a varian treatment planning system algorithm on a siemens linear accelerator in inhomogeneous media

被引:0
|
作者
Finlay, J. [1 ]
Mesina, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2761009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of photon dose calculations in inhomogeneous media using the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) and pencil beam convolution (PBC) implemented in Varian Medical Systems' Eclipse treatment planning system with Siemens linear accelerators. Method and Materials: Using a 0.125 cm3 ionization chamber in a 3‐layer phantom with cork between water‐equivalent layers, we measured absolute depth doses (DD) for 6 and 15 MV, and 3, 5, 10, and 20 cm square fields. To assess lateral disequilibrium modeling, we irradiated another phantom in which the middle cork layer extended laterally only 2.5 cm beyond the central axis, the remainder of the layer being plastic with 10 and 20 cm square fields. Dose profiles were measured using EDR2 film placed at three depths and with a diode detector array placed in the bottom layer. Calculations were performed using AAA and PBC with inhomogeneity correction in Eclipse. Results: For both 6 and 15 MV, the DD calculated by AAA and PBC agreed with measurement within 2% and 3%, respectively proximal to the inhomogeneity beyond the buildup region. Within the inhomogeneity, the agreement was better than 6% for large fields, however, both algorithms overestimated the dose by up to 20% (AAA) or 55% (PBC) for the 3‐cm 6MV field. Distal to the inhomogeneity, AAA modeled the shape of the buildup more accurately than PBC. Lateral profiles indicated that the shape of the penumbra in the inhomogeneous region and the perturbation at the vertical interface predicted by AAA agreed with film and diode array measurements better than PBC. Conclusion: AAA offered an overall improvement over PBC in inhomogeneous media, particularly for small fields and in interface and buildup regions. The overestimate of dose within the inhomogeneity for small fields motivates further investigation, particularly if AAA is used for IMRT calculations in lung. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2481
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Set of Tests Designed for Electron Dose Calculation Algorithm Verification during a Treatment Planning System Upgrade
    Wang, Y.
    Nielsen, M.
    MacPherson, M. S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4639 - 4639
  • [42] Characterization of an advanced cone beam CT (CBCT) reconstruction algorithm used for dose calculation on Varian Halcyon linear accelerators
    Hu, Yunfei
    Arnesen, Marius
    Aland, Trent
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2022, 8 (02)
  • [43] Commissioning and Implementation of a Pencil Beam Algorithm with a Lorentz Correction As a Secondary Dose Calculation Algorithm for an MR-Linear Accelerator
    Taneja, S.
    Wang, H.
    Barbee, D. L.
    Galavis, P. E.
    Serrano-Sosa, M.
    Chen, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (09) : 6611 - 6611
  • [44] The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    Wang, Dongxu
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (01): : 184 - 193
  • [45] Dosimetric validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
    Narayanasamy, Ganesh
    Saenz, Daniel L.
    Defoor, Dewayne
    Papanikolaou, Niko
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (06): : 123 - 129
  • [46] Evaluation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron treatment planning
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Dunkerley, David
    Smilowitz, Jennifer B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (06): : 184 - 193
  • [47] Evaluation of a Commercial Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Algorithm for Electron Treatment Planning
    Huang, J.
    Dunkerley, D.
    Smilowitz, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E546 - E546
  • [48] Simulation of the dose calculation and distribution in radiation Therapy Treatment Planning System
    Machichi, M.
    Oulhouq, Y.
    Rrhioua, A.
    Zerfaoui, M.
    Bakari, D.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 13 : 982 - 990
  • [49] The UCLA experience with linear accelerator radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: An evolution of treatment planning and dose prescription
    Smith, Zachaty A.
    Gorgulho, Alessandra
    Bezruky, Nikita
    Agazarayan, Nzhde
    Selch, Michael
    De Salles, Antonio A. F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 106 (04) : A766 - A766
  • [50] Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system
    Paudel, Moti R.
    Kim, Anthony
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    Ahmad, Sayed B.
    Beachey, David J.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Keller, Brian M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 230 - 241