Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation Using an Optiscope Versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

被引:14
|
作者
Nam, Karam [1 ]
Lee, Younsuk [2 ]
Park, Hee-Pyoung [1 ]
Chung, Jaeyeon [1 ]
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu [1 ]
Kim, Tae Kyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Coll Med, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Med Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2019年 / 129卷 / 06期
关键词
IN-LINE STABILIZATION; GLOBAL LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY; 4 AIRWAY DEVICES; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; LIGHTWAND INTUBATION; SERIES; MANAGEMENT; FIBERSCOPE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In patients with an unstable cervical spine, maintenance of cervical immobilization during tracheal intubation is important. In McGrath videolaryngoscopic intubation, lifting of the blade to raise the epiglottis is needed to visualize the glottis, but in patients with an unstable cervical spine, this can cause cervical spine movement. By contrast, the Optiscope, a rigid video-stylet, does not require raising of the epiglottis during tracheal intubation. We therefore hypothesized that the Optiscope would produce less cervical spine movement than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the Optiscope with the McGrath videolaryngoscope with respect to cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization. METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was the extent of cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments. In this randomized crossover study, the cervical spine angle was measured before and during tracheal intubation using either the Optiscope or the McGrath videolaryngoscope in 21 patients with simulated cervical immobilization. Cervical spine motion was defined as the change in angle at each cervical segment during tracheal intubation. RESULTS: There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment using the Optiscope rather than the McGrath videolaryngoscope (mean [98.33% CI]: 4.7 degrees [2.4-7.0] vs 10.4 degrees [8.1-12.7]; mean difference [98.33% CI]: -5.7 degrees [-7.5 to -3.9]). There were also fewer cervical spinal motions at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments using the Optiscope (mean difference versus the McGrath videolaryngoscope [98.33% CI]: -2.4 degrees [-3.7 to -1.2]) and -3.7 degrees [-5.9 to -1.4], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Optiscope produces less cervical spine motion than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical immobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1666 / 1672
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Successful tracheal intubation with the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope after failure with the Pentax-AWS™ in a patient with cervical spine immobilization
    Hyuga, Shunsuke
    Sekiguchi, Takemi
    Ishida, Takashi
    Yamamoto, Katsumi
    Sugiyama, Yuki
    Kawamata, Mikito
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2012, 59 (12): : 1154 - 1155
  • [32] Evaluation of the GlideScope® for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization by a semi-rigid collar
    Bathory, Istvan
    Kern, Christian
    Schoettker, Patrick
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (41-42) : 19S - 20S
  • [33] Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope®, LMA CTrach®, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes
    Malik, M. A.
    Subramaniam, R.
    Churasia, S.
    Maharaj, C. H.
    Harte, B. H.
    Laffey, J. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (05) : 654 - 661
  • [34] The StyletScope™ is a better intubation tool than a conventional stylet during simulated cervical spine immobilization
    Kihara, S
    Yaguchi, Y
    Taguchi, N
    Brimacombe, JR
    Watanabe, S
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (01): : 105 - 110
  • [35] Tracheal intubation using the ILMA, C-Trach™ or McCoy laryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical spine injury
    Bilgin, H.
    Bozkurt, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 61 (07) : 685 - 691
  • [36] Intubation biomechanics: Computational modeling to identify methods to minimize cervical spine motion and spinal cord strain during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in an intact cervical spine
    Gadomski, Benjamin C.
    Hindman, Bradley J.
    Poland, Michael J.
    Page, Mitchell, I
    Dexter, Franklin
    Puttlitz, Christian M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2022, 81
  • [37] Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization:: Direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy
    Robitaille, Arnaud
    Williams, Stephan R.
    Tremblay, Marie-Helene
    Guilbert, Francois
    Theriault, Melanie
    Drolet, Pierre
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (03): : 935 - 941
  • [38] Endotracheal intubation: ultrasound-guided versus fiberscope in patients with cervical spine immobilization
    Moustafa Abdelaziz Moustafa
    Emad A. Arida
    Ola M. Zanaty
    Sameh Fathy El-tamboly
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2017, 31 : 846 - 851
  • [39] Endotracheal intubation: ultrasound-guided versus fiberscope in patients with cervical spine immobilization
    Moustafa, Moustafa Abdelaziz
    Arida, Emad A.
    Zanaty, Ola M.
    El-tamboly, Sameh Fathy
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (06) : 846 - 851
  • [40] The air-Q as a conduit for fiberoptic aided tracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing cervical spine fixation: A prospective randomized study
    Samir, Enas M.
    Sakr, Sameh A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 28 (02) : 133 - 137