Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation Using an Optiscope Versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

被引:14
|
作者
Nam, Karam [1 ]
Lee, Younsuk [2 ]
Park, Hee-Pyoung [1 ]
Chung, Jaeyeon [1 ]
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu [1 ]
Kim, Tae Kyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Coll Med, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Med Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2019年 / 129卷 / 06期
关键词
IN-LINE STABILIZATION; GLOBAL LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY; 4 AIRWAY DEVICES; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; LIGHTWAND INTUBATION; SERIES; MANAGEMENT; FIBERSCOPE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In patients with an unstable cervical spine, maintenance of cervical immobilization during tracheal intubation is important. In McGrath videolaryngoscopic intubation, lifting of the blade to raise the epiglottis is needed to visualize the glottis, but in patients with an unstable cervical spine, this can cause cervical spine movement. By contrast, the Optiscope, a rigid video-stylet, does not require raising of the epiglottis during tracheal intubation. We therefore hypothesized that the Optiscope would produce less cervical spine movement than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the Optiscope with the McGrath videolaryngoscope with respect to cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization. METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was the extent of cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments. In this randomized crossover study, the cervical spine angle was measured before and during tracheal intubation using either the Optiscope or the McGrath videolaryngoscope in 21 patients with simulated cervical immobilization. Cervical spine motion was defined as the change in angle at each cervical segment during tracheal intubation. RESULTS: There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment using the Optiscope rather than the McGrath videolaryngoscope (mean [98.33% CI]: 4.7 degrees [2.4-7.0] vs 10.4 degrees [8.1-12.7]; mean difference [98.33% CI]: -5.7 degrees [-7.5 to -3.9]). There were also fewer cervical spinal motions at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments using the Optiscope (mean difference versus the McGrath videolaryngoscope [98.33% CI]: -2.4 degrees [-3.7 to -1.2]) and -3.7 degrees [-5.9 to -1.4], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Optiscope produces less cervical spine motion than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical immobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1666 / 1672
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ease of Intubation with McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Incidence of Adverse Events During Tracheal Intubation in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
    Shamim, Faisal
    Sohaib, Muhammad
    Samad, Khalid
    Khan, Muhammad Faisal
    Manji, Adil A.
    Latif, Asad
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 9 (03): : 162 - 169
  • [22] Traditional Spinal Immobilization versus Spinal Motion Restriction in Cervical Spine Movement; a Randomized Crossover Trial
    Nuanprom, Promphet
    Yuksen, Chaiyaporn
    Tienpratarn, Welawat
    Jamkrajang, Parunchaya
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [23] Ease of intubation with McGrath videolaryngoscope and incidence of adverse events during tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients: A prospective observational study
    Shamim, Faisal
    Sohaib, Muhammad
    Samad, Khalid
    Khan, Muhammad Faisal
    Manji, Adil Al Karim
    Latif, Asad
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 137 (05): : 24 - 24
  • [24] A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation plus manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine using the Macintosh laryngoscope vs the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope
    Ilyas, S.
    Symons, J.
    Bradley, W. P. L.
    Segal, R.
    Taylor, H.
    Lee, K.
    Balkin, M.
    Bain, C.
    Ng, I.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (12) : 1345 - 1350
  • [25] The performance of C-MAC videostylet versus D-Blade during tracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: A randomized comparative trial
    Anany, Adel Said Mohammed
    Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem
    Oll, Magda Mohamed Abo
    Rida, Hossam El-Din Fouad
    El-Attar, Eman Ahmed Mohamed
    Hozien, Adel Ibrahim
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 40 (01): : 308 - 316
  • [26] Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A comparison of McGrath((R)) video laryngoscope and Truview EVO2((R)) laryngoscope
    Bhola, Ruchi
    Bhalla, Swaran
    Gupta, Radha
    Singh, Ishwar
    Kumar, Sunil
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 58 (03) : 269 - 274
  • [27] Tracheal intubation in a simulated cervical spine immobilisation: The Macintosh laryngoscope versus supraglottic airway devices - A manikin study
    Aleksandrowicz, Dawid
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 21 : 53 - 56
  • [28] Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
    Park, Jin-Woo
    An, Sungmin
    Park, Seongjoo
    Nahm, Francis Sahngun
    Han, Sung-Hee
    Kim, Jin-Hee
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [29] Comparison of three types of intubation stylets for tracheal intubation with a McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope by novice intubators in simulated cervical immobilisation: A randomised crossover manikin study
    Kim, Sung-Wook
    Kim, Ji-Hoon
    Kim, Young-Min
    Park, Jung Taek
    Choi, Seung Pill
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [30] Successful tracheal intubation with the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope after failure with the Pentax-AWS™ in a patient with cervical spine immobilization
    Shunsuke Hyuga
    Takemi Sekiguchi
    Takashi Ishida
    Katsumi Yamamoto
    Yuki Sugiyama
    Mikito Kawamata
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2012, 59 : 1154 - 1155