Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics

被引:319
|
作者
Pollock, Danielle [1 ]
Davies, Ellen L. [2 ]
Peters, Micah D. J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tricco, Andrea C. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Alexander, Lyndsay [9 ,10 ]
McInerney, Patricia [11 ,12 ]
Godfrey, Christina M. [8 ,13 ]
Khalil, Hanan [14 ]
Munn, Zachary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, JBI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Ctr Evidence Based Practice South Australia CEPSA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Epidemiol Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Queens Collaborat Hlth Care Qual, Kingston, ON, Canada
[9] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[10] Scottish Ctr Evidence Based Multi Profess Practic, Aberdeen, Scotland
[11] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[12] Wits JBI Ctr Evidence Based Practice, Johannesburg, South Africa
[13] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada
[14] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
evidence synthesis; methodology; midwifery; nursing; PRISMA‐ ScR; reporting; scoping review;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14743
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. Design Discussion Paper. Data Sources Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). Implications for nursing and midwifery Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. Conclusion This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. Impact With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
引用
收藏
页码:2102 / 2113
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Conceptualising a model to guide nursing and midwifery in the community guided by an evidence review
    Patricia Leahy-Warren
    Helen Mulcahy
    Lazelle Benefield
    Colin Bradley
    Alice Coffey
    Ann Donohoe
    Serena Fitzgerald
    Tim Frawley
    Elizabeth Healy
    Maria Healy
    Marcella Kelly
    Bernard McCarthy
    Kathleen McLoughlin
    Catherine Meagher
    Rhona O’Connell
    Aoife O’Mahony
    Gillian Paul
    Amanda Phelan
    Diarmuid Stokes
    Jessica Walsh
    Eileen Savage
    BMC Nursing, 16
  • [42] Individual and environmental factors that influence longevity of newcomers to nursing and midwifery: a scoping review
    Brown, Janie Alison
    Capper, Tanya
    Hegney, Desley
    Donovan, Helen
    Williamson, Moira
    Calleja, Pauline
    Solomons, Terena
    Wilson, Sally
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (05) : 753 - 789
  • [43] The integration of immersive virtual reality in tertiary nursing and midwifery education: A scoping review
    Fealy, Sharma
    Jones, Donovan
    Hutton, Alison
    Graham, Kristen
    McNeill, Liz
    Sweet, Linda
    Hazelton, Michael
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2019, 79 : 14 - 19
  • [44] The Internet research handbook: A practical guide for students and researchers in the social sciences
    Stanton, JM
    ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2004, 7 (01) : 115 - 118
  • [45] Exploring first nations nursing and midwifery leadership development: an international scoping review
    Best, Odette
    Richards, Catelyn
    Stuart, Lynne
    Deravin, Linda
    Ward, Aletha
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2025,
  • [46] Modern Regression Techniques Using R: A Practical Guide for Students and Researchers
    Markus, Keith A.
    Gu, Wen
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 34 (07) : 549 - 551
  • [47] The Use of Educational Technology in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Nursing and Midwifery Education A Scoping Review
    Hernon, Orlaith
    McSharry, Edel
    MacLaren, Iain
    Dunne, Rosie
    Carr, Peter J.
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2023, 41 (03) : 162 - 171
  • [48] Aromatherapy in Nursing and Midwifery Practice: A Scoping Review of Published Studies Since 2005
    Maddocks, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF HOLISTIC NURSING, 2023, 41 (01) : 62 - 89
  • [49] Clinical nursing and midwifery research in Latin American and Caribbean countries: A scoping review
    Iribarren, Sarah
    Stonbraker, Samantha
    Larsen, Brandon
    Santos, Islane
    Faria, Renata
    Goes, Fernanda S. N.
    Binfa, Lorena
    Larson, Elaine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (02)
  • [50] Academic dishonesty in university nursing students: A scoping review
    He, Flora Xuhua
    Fanaian, Mahnaz
    Zhang, Nancy Ming
    Lea, Xanthe
    Geale, Sara Katherine
    Gielis, Lisa
    Razaghi, Kazem
    Evans, Alicia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2024, 154