Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics

被引:319
|
作者
Pollock, Danielle [1 ]
Davies, Ellen L. [2 ]
Peters, Micah D. J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tricco, Andrea C. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Alexander, Lyndsay [9 ,10 ]
McInerney, Patricia [11 ,12 ]
Godfrey, Christina M. [8 ,13 ]
Khalil, Hanan [14 ]
Munn, Zachary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, JBI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Ctr Evidence Based Practice South Australia CEPSA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Epidemiol Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Queens Collaborat Hlth Care Qual, Kingston, ON, Canada
[9] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[10] Scottish Ctr Evidence Based Multi Profess Practic, Aberdeen, Scotland
[11] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[12] Wits JBI Ctr Evidence Based Practice, Johannesburg, South Africa
[13] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada
[14] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
evidence synthesis; methodology; midwifery; nursing; PRISMA‐ ScR; reporting; scoping review;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14743
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. Design Discussion Paper. Data Sources Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). Implications for nursing and midwifery Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. Conclusion This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. Impact With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
引用
收藏
页码:2102 / 2113
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Australian nursing and midwifery informatics roles: A scoping review
    Jedwab, Rebecca M.
    Langtree, Tanya G.
    Lopresti, Kate C.
    Jones, Aaron J.
    Dobroff, Naomi
    COLLEGIAN, 2025, 32 (02) : 76 - 83
  • [22] Clinical nursing and midwifery research in African countries: A scoping review
    Sun, Carolyn
    Larson, Elaine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2015, 52 (05) : 1011 - 1016
  • [23] Extending the scoping review framework: a guide for interdisciplinary researchers
    Teare, Georgia
    Taks, Marijke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 23 (03) : 311 - 315
  • [24] Key considerations when developing academic writing support for nursing and midwifery doctoral students: A scoping review
    Wong, Wai Yee Amy
    Caughers, Gemma
    Saifullah, Azam David
    Galeotti, Martina
    Kemp, Bridie J.
    Cooper, Claire
    Matthews, Michael
    Wilson, Christine Brown
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2025, 144
  • [25] Genetics of mental disorders. A guide to students, clinicians, and researchers.
    Mundo, E
    Kennedy, JL
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 27 (04): : 291 - 292
  • [26] Empathy in Nursing Students: A Scoping Review
    Juniarta
    Eka, Ni Gusti Ayu
    Sitanggang, Yenni Ferawati
    JOURNAL OF HOLISTIC NURSING, 2024, 42 (2_SUPPL) : S59 - S86
  • [27] Is faculty practice valuable? The experience of Western Australian nursing and midwifery academics undertaking faculty clinical practice - A discussion paper
    Fowler, Amanda C.
    Baker, Melanie
    Geraghty, Sadie
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2017, 26 : 91 - 95
  • [28] Undertaking qualitative reviews in nursing and education-A method of thematic analysis for students and clinicians
    Purssell, Edward
    Gould, Dinah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES, 2021, 3
  • [29] Study Guide and Review of Practical Nursing
    Phillips, Elisabeth C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1955, 55 (08) : 996 - 997
  • [30] Exploring resilience in nursing and midwifery students: a literature review
    McGowan, Jennifer E.
    Murray, Karen
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (10) : 2272 - 2283