Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics

被引:319
|
作者
Pollock, Danielle [1 ]
Davies, Ellen L. [2 ]
Peters, Micah D. J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tricco, Andrea C. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Alexander, Lyndsay [9 ,10 ]
McInerney, Patricia [11 ,12 ]
Godfrey, Christina M. [8 ,13 ]
Khalil, Hanan [14 ]
Munn, Zachary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, JBI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Ctr Evidence Based Practice South Australia CEPSA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Epidemiol Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Queens Collaborat Hlth Care Qual, Kingston, ON, Canada
[9] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[10] Scottish Ctr Evidence Based Multi Profess Practic, Aberdeen, Scotland
[11] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[12] Wits JBI Ctr Evidence Based Practice, Johannesburg, South Africa
[13] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada
[14] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
evidence synthesis; methodology; midwifery; nursing; PRISMA‐ ScR; reporting; scoping review;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14743
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. Design Discussion Paper. Data Sources Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). Implications for nursing and midwifery Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. Conclusion This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. Impact With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
引用
收藏
页码:2102 / 2113
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakers
    Khalil, Hanan
    McInerney, Patricia
    Pollock, Danielle
    Alexander, Lindsay
    Munn, Zac
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Godfrey, Christina M.
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 47 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [2] Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers, and Academics
    Awasom, Innocent
    LIBRARY QUARTERLY, 2018, 88 (02): : 197 - 199
  • [3] Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics
    Rodriguez, Michael
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 141 (19) : 101 - 101
  • [4] Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics
    Calvert, Philip
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2017, 35 (04): : 840 - 841
  • [5] Pain Assessment: A Practical Guide for Researchers and Clinicians
    Kim E. Dixon
    Beverly E. Thorn
    Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 2015, 33 : 202 - 217
  • [6] The assessment of fatigue - A practical guide for clinicians and researchers
    Dittner, AJ
    Wessely, SC
    Brown, RG
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2004, 56 (02) : 157 - 170
  • [7] Pain Assessment: A Practical Guide for Researchers and Clinicians
    Dixon, Kim E.
    Thorn, Beverly E.
    JOURNAL OF RATIONAL-EMOTIVE AND COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2015, 33 (03): : 202 - 217
  • [8] Practitioner Engagement by Academic Researchers: A Scoping Review of Nursing, Midwifery, and Therapy Professions Literature
    Daniels, Nicola
    Gillen, Patricia
    Casson, Karen
    RESEARCH AND THEORY FOR NURSING PRACTICE, 2020, 34 (02) : 85 - 128
  • [9] Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics.
    Aaen-Stockdale, Craig
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2017, 78 (01): : 114 - 116
  • [10] Genetics of mental disorders: A guide for students, clinicians, and researchers
    Gershon, ES
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 157 (05): : 844 - 844