A Monte Carlo model for organ dose reconstruction of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for epidemiologic studies of late effects

被引:12
|
作者
Yeom, Yeon Soo [1 ]
Kuzmin, Gleb [2 ]
Griffin, Keith [1 ]
Mille, Matthew [1 ]
Polf, Jerimy [3 ]
Langner, Ulrich [4 ]
Jung, Jae Won [5 ]
Lee, Choonik [6 ]
Ellis, Dillon [5 ]
Shin, Jungwook [7 ]
Lee, Choonsik [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] East Carolina Univ, Dept Phys, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Div Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
proton; pencil beam scanning; Monte Carlo; dose reconstruction; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; EXPOSURES; DOSIMETRY; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/ab437d
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Significant efforts such as the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) involving multiple proton therapy centers have been made to conduct collaborative studies evaluating outcomes following proton therapy. As a groundwork dosimetry effort for the late effect investigation, we developed a Monte Carlo (MC) model of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) to estimate organ/tissue doses of pediatric patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC), one of the proton centers involved in the PPCR. The MC beam modeling was performed using the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation) MC code and commissioned to match measurement data within 1% for range, and 0.3 mm for spot sizes. The established MC model was then tested by calculating organ/tissue doses for sample intracranial and craniospinal irradiations on whole-body pediatric computational human phantoms. The simulated dose distributions were compared with the treatment planning system dose distributions, showing the 3 mm/3% gamma index passing rates of 94%-99%, validating our simulations with the MC model. The calculated organ/tissue doses per prescribed doses for the craniospinal irradiations (1 mGy Gy(-1) to 1 Gy Gy(-1)) were generally much higher than those for the intracranial irradiations (2.1 mu Gy Gy(-1) to 0.1 Gy Gy(-1)), which is due to the larger field coverage of the craniospinal irradiations. The largest difference was observed at the adrenal dose, i.e. similar to 3000 times. In addition, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those calculated with a simplified MC model, showing that the beam properties (i.e. spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) do not significantly influence dose calculations despite the limited irradiation cases. This implies that the use of the MC model commissioned to the MPTC measurement data might be dosimetrically acceptable for patient dose reconstructions at other proton centers particularly when their measurement data are unavailable. The developed MC model will be used to reconstruct organ/tissue doses for MPTC pediatric patients collected in the PPCR.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 242
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monte Carlo vs. pencil-beam dose calculation for uncertainty estimation in proton therapy
    Wahl, N.
    Wieser, H.
    Burigo, L.
    Bangert, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S731 - S731
  • [42] Point dose comparison of Monte Carlo and pencil beam algorithms in treatment planning system for proton therapy
    Monkongsubsin, Wiroon
    Keawsamur, Mintra
    Sanghangthum, Taweap
    Ayuthaya, Isra Israngkul Na
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [43] A Golden Beam Data Commissioning Framework of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Algorithms of Two Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Treatment Planning Systems
    Chang, C.
    Harms, J.
    Zhang, R.
    Zhou, J.
    Lin, Y.
    Slopsema, R.
    Dhabaan, A.
    Liu, T.
    McDonald, M.
    Langen, K.
    Lin, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E167 - E167
  • [44] Dose Comparison between Proton Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Algorithm in Lung Cancer Patients
    Maes, D.
    Bowen, S. R.
    Fung, A.
    Saini, J.
    Bloch, C.
    Egan, A.
    Zeng, J.
    Rengan, R.
    Wong, T. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E694 - E694
  • [45] Pseudo Proton Radiography Beam Validation of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation in Two Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning Systems
    Chang, C.
    Zhou, J.
    Yang, X.
    Dhabaan, A.
    Zhang, R.
    Liu, T.
    McDonald, M.
    Langen, K.
    Lin, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E592 - E592
  • [46] Skin Dose in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning for Pediatric Patients
    Axente, M.
    Moskvin, V.
    Shin, J.
    Tsiamas, P.
    Merchant, T.
    Farr, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3498 - 3498
  • [47] Experimental Validation of the Monte Carlo Model of HYPERSCAN™ Pencil Beam Scanning System for Proton Beam Imaging and Radiation Treatment
    Huo, W.
    Zwart, T.
    Finley, C.
    Jee, K.
    Sharp, G.
    Rosenthal, S.
    Xu, X.
    Lu, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2872 - 2872
  • [48] Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy
    Carlino, A.
    Boehlen, T.
    Vatnitsky, S.
    Grevillot, L.
    Osorio, J.
    Dreindl, R.
    Palmans, H.
    Stock, M.
    Kragl, G.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (17):
  • [49] Monte Carlo modeling of non-isocentric proton pencil beam scanning treatments
    Elia, A.
    Grevillot, L.
    Carlino, A.
    Boehlen, T.
    Fuchs, H.
    Stock, M.
    Sarrut, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S806 - S807
  • [50] Criteria of spot asymmetry in proton radiotherapy pencil beam scanning - a Monte Carlo study
    Klodowska, M.
    Gajewski, J.
    Skowronska, K.
    Olko, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S57 - S58