Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study

被引:8
|
作者
Kucharzyk, Donald [1 ]
Colle, Kyle [2 ]
Boone, Christopher [3 ]
Araghi, Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] DK Orthoped, Crown Point, IN USA
[2] Reg Brain & Spine, Cape Girardeau, MO USA
[3] Proliance Orthopaed & Sports Med, 1231 116th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
[4] CORE Inst, Sun City West, AZ USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
sacroiliac joint dysfunction; sacroiliac joint fusion; SI joint; SI joint arthrodesis; minimally invasive surgery; sacroiliac; fusion; arthrodesis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; EUROQOL;
D O I
10.14444/8185
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This report documents 1-year results of 250 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of a minimally invasive (MI) sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) system that uses decortication, graft placement, and joint fixation. Methods: The cohort includes all patients enrolled in the EVoluSIon (EVSI) clinical study who had MI SIJF surgery and completed 1-year follow-up. Average age at baseline was 60.5 years, and 70.8% were female. Sacroiliac (SI) joint-related pain duration was >= 2 years in 56% of patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) SI joint pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life, and opioid use were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year. Results: At 1 year, the mean VAS pain demonstrated a significant reduction of more than 43 points, from 76.4 at baseline to 33.0 (P < 0.0001), with 72.2% of patients attaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, >= 20-point improvement). Mean ODI scores also significantly improved from 54.4 at baseline to 30.5 at 1 year (P < 0.0001), with 62.5% of patients achieving the MCID (>= 15-point improvement). Prior to surgery. 62.7% (126/201) of patients were taking opioids or other narcotics, but by 1 year postsurgery. only 26.9% (54/201) of patients reported using these medications. representing a significant 57.1% decrease in narcotic/opioid use (P < 0.0001). Fusion of the SI joint was seen in 68.7% of patients. Few procedural complications were reported. In all, there were 8 (8/250) serious procedure-related events, including 1 device malposition observed on the day of surgery that required replacing the superior screw with a shorter screw. Conclusions: Analysis of patients treated with MI SIJF in the EVSI study demonstrated that the procedure can be performed safely and results in significant improvements in pain, quality of life. and opioid use at 1 year as well as causing fusion in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Six Month Interim Outcomes from SECURE: A Single arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Clinical Study on a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device
    Calodney, Aaron K.
    Azeem, Nomen
    Buchanan, Patrick
    Skaribas, Ioannis
    Antony, Ajay
    Kim, Christopher
    Girardi, George
    Vu, Chau
    Bovinet, Christopher
    Vogel, Rainer S.
    Li, Sean
    Jassal, Naveep
    Josephson, Youssef
    Lubenow, Timothy R.
    Girardi, Nicholas
    Pope, Jason E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2022, 19 (05) : 451 - 461
  • [42] Three-Year Clinical Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Using Triangular Implants in Japan: A Pilot Study of Five Cases
    Kurosawa, Daisuke
    Murakami, Eiichi
    Koga, Hiroaki
    Ozawa, Hiroshi
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (01): : 71 - 78
  • [43] Clinical results following robotic navigation guidance for sacroiliac joint fusion in 36 patients
    Chaves, Jennyfer Paulla Galdino
    Maalouly, Joseph
    Choi, John Yun Seo
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2022, 52 (01)
  • [44] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
    Holste, Katherine G. G.
    Saleh, Sara
    Bruzek, Amy K. K.
    Strong, Michael J. J.
    Park, Paul
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 23 (01) : E54 - E54
  • [45] Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus
    Teoh, Kar Hao
    Tan, Wei Teen
    Atiyah, Zeid
    Ahmad, Aziz
    Tanaka, Hiro
    Hariharan, Kartik
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 40 (02) : 195 - 201
  • [46] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion for the Treatment of Brucella Pyogenic Sacroiliitis: A Case Report
    Anton, Gustavo
    Tong, Doris
    Little, Tania
    Soo, Teck M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [47] A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique
    Heiney, Jake
    Capobianco, Robyn
    Cher, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
  • [48] Contemporary Trends in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Utilization in the Medicare Population by Specialty
    Hersh, Andrew M.
    Jimenez, Adrian E.
    Pellot, Karolina I.
    Gong, Jung Ho
    Jiang, Kelly
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Ahmed, A. Karim
    Raad, Micheal
    Veeravagu, Anand
    Ratliff, John K.
    Jain, Amit
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Bydon, Ali
    Witham, Timothy F.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Azad, Tej D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) : 1244 - 1250
  • [49] Minimally invasive arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction using the SImmetry SI Joint Fusion system
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2014, 7 : 125 - 130
  • [50] The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Sang-Hyuk Min
    Jae-Sung Yoo
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 1164 - 1172