Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study

被引:8
|
作者
Kucharzyk, Donald [1 ]
Colle, Kyle [2 ]
Boone, Christopher [3 ]
Araghi, Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] DK Orthoped, Crown Point, IN USA
[2] Reg Brain & Spine, Cape Girardeau, MO USA
[3] Proliance Orthopaed & Sports Med, 1231 116th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
[4] CORE Inst, Sun City West, AZ USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
sacroiliac joint dysfunction; sacroiliac joint fusion; SI joint; SI joint arthrodesis; minimally invasive surgery; sacroiliac; fusion; arthrodesis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; EUROQOL;
D O I
10.14444/8185
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This report documents 1-year results of 250 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of a minimally invasive (MI) sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) system that uses decortication, graft placement, and joint fixation. Methods: The cohort includes all patients enrolled in the EVoluSIon (EVSI) clinical study who had MI SIJF surgery and completed 1-year follow-up. Average age at baseline was 60.5 years, and 70.8% were female. Sacroiliac (SI) joint-related pain duration was >= 2 years in 56% of patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) SI joint pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life, and opioid use were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year. Results: At 1 year, the mean VAS pain demonstrated a significant reduction of more than 43 points, from 76.4 at baseline to 33.0 (P < 0.0001), with 72.2% of patients attaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, >= 20-point improvement). Mean ODI scores also significantly improved from 54.4 at baseline to 30.5 at 1 year (P < 0.0001), with 62.5% of patients achieving the MCID (>= 15-point improvement). Prior to surgery. 62.7% (126/201) of patients were taking opioids or other narcotics, but by 1 year postsurgery. only 26.9% (54/201) of patients reported using these medications. representing a significant 57.1% decrease in narcotic/opioid use (P < 0.0001). Fusion of the SI joint was seen in 68.7% of patients. Few procedural complications were reported. In all, there were 8 (8/250) serious procedure-related events, including 1 device malposition observed on the day of surgery that required replacing the superior screw with a shorter screw. Conclusions: Analysis of patients treated with MI SIJF in the EVSI study demonstrated that the procedure can be performed safely and results in significant improvements in pain, quality of life. and opioid use at 1 year as well as causing fusion in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
    Woods, Michael
    Birkholz, Denise
    MacBarb, Regina
    Capobianco, Robyn
    Woods, Adam
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 2014
  • [22] Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
    Whang, Peter G.
    Darr, Emily
    Meyer, S. Craig
    Kovalsky, Don
    Frank, Clay
    Lockstadt, Harry
    Limoni, Robert
    Redmond, Andy J.
    Ploska, Philip
    Oh, Michael
    Chowdhary, Abhineet
    Cher, Daniel
    Hillen, Travis
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 411 - 422
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion—a Review
    Caio M. Matias
    Lohit Velagapudi
    Thiago S. Montenegro
    Joshua E. Heller
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2022, 26 : 173 - 182
  • [24] Ethnic Differences in Western and Asian Sacroiliac Joint Anatomy for Surgical Planning of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Wu, Christopher
    Liu, Yu-Cheng
    Koga, Hiroaki
    Lee, Ching-Yu
    Wang, Po-Yao
    Cher, Daniel
    Reckling, W. Carlton
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Stabilization
    Novak, V
    Wanek, T.
    Hrabalek, L.
    Stejskal, P.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2021, 88 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [26] Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review
    Anton, Gustavo
    Alsalahi, Ammar
    Yoon, Elise J.
    Turnbull, Jeffrey
    Dragonette, James
    Richards, Boyd
    Tong, Doris
    Soo, Teck M.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [27] Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion stratified by preoperative diagnosis
    Kaveh Khajavi
    Alessandria Shen
    Madeline Lagina
    Anthony Hutchison
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 322 - 330
  • [28] Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion stratified by preoperative diagnosis
    Khajavi, Kaveh
    Shen, Alessandria
    Lagina, Madeline
    Hutchison, Anthony
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S322 - S330
  • [29] Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results
    Hermans, Sem M. M.
    Knoef, Rob J. H.
    Schuermans, Valerie N. E.
    Schotanus, Martijn G. M.
    Nellensteijn, Jorm M.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    Curfs, Inez
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [30] Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results
    Sem M. M. Hermans
    Rob J. H. Knoef
    Valérie N. E. Schuermans
    Martijn G. M. Schotanus
    Jorm M. Nellensteijn
    Henk van Santbrink
    Inez Curfs
    Wouter L. W. van Hemert
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17