Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study

被引:8
|
作者
Kucharzyk, Donald [1 ]
Colle, Kyle [2 ]
Boone, Christopher [3 ]
Araghi, Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] DK Orthoped, Crown Point, IN USA
[2] Reg Brain & Spine, Cape Girardeau, MO USA
[3] Proliance Orthopaed & Sports Med, 1231 116th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
[4] CORE Inst, Sun City West, AZ USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
sacroiliac joint dysfunction; sacroiliac joint fusion; SI joint; SI joint arthrodesis; minimally invasive surgery; sacroiliac; fusion; arthrodesis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; EUROQOL;
D O I
10.14444/8185
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This report documents 1-year results of 250 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of a minimally invasive (MI) sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) system that uses decortication, graft placement, and joint fixation. Methods: The cohort includes all patients enrolled in the EVoluSIon (EVSI) clinical study who had MI SIJF surgery and completed 1-year follow-up. Average age at baseline was 60.5 years, and 70.8% were female. Sacroiliac (SI) joint-related pain duration was >= 2 years in 56% of patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) SI joint pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life, and opioid use were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year. Results: At 1 year, the mean VAS pain demonstrated a significant reduction of more than 43 points, from 76.4 at baseline to 33.0 (P < 0.0001), with 72.2% of patients attaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, >= 20-point improvement). Mean ODI scores also significantly improved from 54.4 at baseline to 30.5 at 1 year (P < 0.0001), with 62.5% of patients achieving the MCID (>= 15-point improvement). Prior to surgery. 62.7% (126/201) of patients were taking opioids or other narcotics, but by 1 year postsurgery. only 26.9% (54/201) of patients reported using these medications. representing a significant 57.1% decrease in narcotic/opioid use (P < 0.0001). Fusion of the SI joint was seen in 68.7% of patients. Few procedural complications were reported. In all, there were 8 (8/250) serious procedure-related events, including 1 device malposition observed on the day of surgery that required replacing the superior screw with a shorter screw. Conclusions: Analysis of patients treated with MI SIJF in the EVSI study demonstrated that the procedure can be performed safely and results in significant improvements in pain, quality of life. and opioid use at 1 year as well as causing fusion in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with Decortication and Bone Grafting: 1-year Clinical Outcomes
    Grunch, Betsy H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 246 - 247
  • [2] Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with allograft using a posterior approach
    Moghim, Robert
    Bovinet, Chris
    Jin, Max Y.
    Edwards, Katie
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [3] Patient Reported Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis
    Schmidt, Gary L.
    Bologna, Matthew
    Schorr, Rebecca
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Garfin, Steven R.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 34 (08) : 600 - 601
  • [5] Sacroiliac dysfunction and minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion
    Fleming, Jacob W.
    Pan, Tommy
    Abubakar, Mohammed
    Shonnard, Matthew
    Radlicz, Chris
    Beall, Douglas P.
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [6] First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint
    Kasapovic, Adnan
    Schwetje, Desiree
    Ali, Thaer
    Jaenisch, Max
    Gathen, Martin
    Bornemann, Rahel
    Abdallah, Hany
    Vieweg, Uwe
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (05) : 1139 - 1145
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcomes and Computed Tomography Review After Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint With Aggressive Joint Decortication and Joint Compression
    Cross III, William W.
    Tomov, Marko N.
    Hung, Michelle Y.
    Muir, Jeffrey M.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 47 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [8] Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Scoping Review
    Mehkri, Yusuf
    Tishad, Abtahi
    Nichols, Spencer
    Scott, Kyle W.
    Arias, Jonathan
    Lucke-Wold, Brandon
    Rahmathulla, Gazanfar
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : 120 - 132
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence
    Martin, Christopher T.
    Haase, Lucas
    Lender, Paul A.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 : S20 - S29
  • [10] Surgical and clinical efficacy of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion surgery: a meta-analysis protocol
    Anton, Gustavo
    Beladi, Roxana
    Lawless, Michael
    Yoon, Elise
    Tong, Doris
    Soo, Teck M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):