Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast

被引:15
|
作者
Cho, Yun Hee [1 ]
Cho, Kyu Ran [1 ]
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Seo, Bo Kyoung [1 ]
Woo, Ok Hee [1 ]
Cho, Sung Bum [1 ]
Bae, Jeoung Won [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul 136705, South Korea
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Diagnosis; Non-Mass Enhancement; Preoperative Care; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CONTRALATERAL BREAST; NONMASSLIKE ENHANCEMENT; INTERPRETATION MODEL; LESIONS; FEATURES; MALIGNANCY; ACCURACY; WOMEN; METAANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.30909
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: In preoperative assessment of breast cancer, MRI has been shown to identify more additional breast lesions than are detectable using conventional imaging techniques. The characterization of additional lesions is more important than detection for optimal surgical treatment. Additional breast lesions can be included in focus, mass, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI. According to the fifth edition of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS (R)), which includes several changes in the NME descriptors, few studies to date have evaluated NME in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Objectives: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of BI-RADS descriptors in predicting malignancy for additional NME lesions detected on preoperative 3T dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2012, 88 patients were enrolled in our study, all with NME lesions other than the index cancer on preoperative 3T DCE-MRI and all with accompanying histopathologic examination. The MRI findings were analyzed according to the BI-RADS MRI lexicon. We evaluated the size, distribution, internal enhancement pattern, and location of NME lesions relative to the index cancer (i.e., same quadrant, different quadrant, or contralateral breast). Results: On histopathologic analysis of the 88 NME lesions, 73 (83%) were malignant and 15 (17%) were benign. Lesion size did not differ significantly between malignant and benign lesions (P = 0.410). Malignancy was more frequent in linear (P = 0.005) and segmental (P = 0.011) distributions, and benignancy was more frequent in focal (P = 0.004) and regional (P < 0.001) NME lesions. The highest positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy occurred in segmental (96.8%), linear (95.1%), clustered ring (100%), and clumped (92.0%) enhancement. Asymmetry demonstrated a high positive predictive value of 85.9%. The frequency of malignancy was higher for NME lesions located in the same quadrant with the index cancer (P = 0.006), and benignancy was higher in the contralateral breast (P = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, linear (P = 0.001) and segmental (P = 0.005) distributions were significant predictors of malignancy. Conclusion: The possibility of malignancy is strongly indicated when additional NME lesions show linear or segmental enhancement on preoperative 3T DCE-MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Non-rigid Registration Method for Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Breast MRI
    Wang, Yangping
    Dang, Jianwu
    Du, Xiaogang
    Li, Sha
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, PT II, 2011, 135 : 644 - +
  • [42] The kinetic quantitative characteristics of non-mass breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a prospective study
    Cai, Ying-Yu
    Du, Yi-Chao
    Zhao, Lei
    Hu, Wen-Jie
    Bai, Yun
    Chen, An
    Du, Lian-Fang
    Li, Fan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 96 (1152):
  • [43] Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI features correlate with invasive breast cancer angiogenesis
    Xiao, Jennifer
    Rahbar, Habib
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Rendi, Mara H.
    Parker, Elizabeth U.
    Shekar, Neal
    Hirano, Michael
    Cheung, Kevin J.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [44] Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI features correlate with invasive breast cancer angiogenesis
    Jennifer Xiao
    Habib Rahbar
    Daniel S. Hippe
    Mara H. Rendi
    Elizabeth U. Parker
    Neal Shekar
    Michael Hirano
    Kevin J. Cheung
    Savannah C. Partridge
    npj Breast Cancer, 7
  • [45] Further Consideration on "Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Papillary Neoplasms on MRI With Non-mass Enhancement"
    Cui, Yanhai
    Zhou, Shuqin
    Liu, Changjiang
    Xu, Li
    Zhang, Hongdan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 1721 - 1721
  • [46] Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI-based radiomics
    Liu, Zhuangsheng
    Feng, Bao
    Li, Changlin
    Chen, Yehang
    Chen, Qinxian
    Li, Xiaoping
    Guan, Jianhua
    Chen, Xiangmeng
    Cui, Enming
    Li, Ronggang
    Li, Zhi
    Long, Wansheng
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (03) : 847 - 857
  • [47] Diagnostic value of contrast enhanced digital mammography versus contrast enhanced MRI for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer
    Kim, E. Y.
    Youn, I.
    Park, C. H.
    Kook, S. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [48] Cost- Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Staging Modalities: Point-Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to Breast MRI for Preoperative Staging in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    Essers, Brigitte A. B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2023, 221 (04) : 434 - 435
  • [49] Multiparametric breast MRI with 3T: Effectivity of combination of contrast enhanced MRI, DWI and 1H single voxel spectroscopy in differentiation of Breast tumors
    Aribal, Erkin
    Asadov, Ruslan
    Ramazan, Abdullah
    Ugurlu, Mustafa Umit
    Kaya, Handan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (05) : 979 - 986
  • [50] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Filippo Montemurro
    Laura Martincich
    Giovanni De Rosa
    Stefano Cirillo
    Vincenzo Marra
    Nicoletta Biglia
    Marco Gatti
    Piero Sismondi
    Massimo Aglietta
    Daniele Regge
    European Radiology, 2005, 15 : 1224 - 1233