Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast

被引:15
|
作者
Cho, Yun Hee [1 ]
Cho, Kyu Ran [1 ]
Park, Eun Kyung [1 ]
Seo, Bo Kyoung [1 ]
Woo, Ok Hee [1 ]
Cho, Sung Bum [1 ]
Bae, Jeoung Won [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul 136705, South Korea
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Diagnosis; Non-Mass Enhancement; Preoperative Care; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CONTRALATERAL BREAST; NONMASSLIKE ENHANCEMENT; INTERPRETATION MODEL; LESIONS; FEATURES; MALIGNANCY; ACCURACY; WOMEN; METAANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.30909
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: In preoperative assessment of breast cancer, MRI has been shown to identify more additional breast lesions than are detectable using conventional imaging techniques. The characterization of additional lesions is more important than detection for optimal surgical treatment. Additional breast lesions can be included in focus, mass, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI. According to the fifth edition of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS (R)), which includes several changes in the NME descriptors, few studies to date have evaluated NME in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Objectives: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of BI-RADS descriptors in predicting malignancy for additional NME lesions detected on preoperative 3T dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2012, 88 patients were enrolled in our study, all with NME lesions other than the index cancer on preoperative 3T DCE-MRI and all with accompanying histopathologic examination. The MRI findings were analyzed according to the BI-RADS MRI lexicon. We evaluated the size, distribution, internal enhancement pattern, and location of NME lesions relative to the index cancer (i.e., same quadrant, different quadrant, or contralateral breast). Results: On histopathologic analysis of the 88 NME lesions, 73 (83%) were malignant and 15 (17%) were benign. Lesion size did not differ significantly between malignant and benign lesions (P = 0.410). Malignancy was more frequent in linear (P = 0.005) and segmental (P = 0.011) distributions, and benignancy was more frequent in focal (P = 0.004) and regional (P < 0.001) NME lesions. The highest positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy occurred in segmental (96.8%), linear (95.1%), clustered ring (100%), and clumped (92.0%) enhancement. Asymmetry demonstrated a high positive predictive value of 85.9%. The frequency of malignancy was higher for NME lesions located in the same quadrant with the index cancer (P = 0.006), and benignancy was higher in the contralateral breast (P = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, linear (P = 0.001) and segmental (P = 0.005) distributions were significant predictors of malignancy. Conclusion: The possibility of malignancy is strongly indicated when additional NME lesions show linear or segmental enhancement on preoperative 3T DCE-MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Significance of nipple enhancement of Paget’s disease in contrast enhanced breast MRI
    Hyeon Sook Kim
    Jee Hyun Seok
    Eun Suk Cha
    Bong Joo Kang
    Hak Hee Kim
    Young Jin Seo
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2010, 282 : 157 - 162
  • [32] The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Saracco, Ariel
    Strand, Fredrik
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Sundbom, Ann
    Hall, Per
    Dickman, Paul W.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (12) : 1600 - 1607
  • [33] Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    K. A. Kvistad
    J. Rydland
    H. -B. Smethurst
    S. Lundgren
    H. E. Fjøsne
    O. Haraldseth
    European Radiology, 2000, 10 : 1464 - 1471
  • [34] Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Kvistad, KA
    Rydland, J
    Smethurst, HB
    Lundgren, S
    Fjosne, HE
    Haraldseth, O
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (09) : 1464 - 1471
  • [35] Dynamic NMR effects in breast cancer dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI
    Li, Xin
    Huang, Wei
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Tudorica, Luminita A.
    Seshan, Venkatraman E.
    Rooney, William D.
    Tagge, Ian
    Wang, Ya
    Xu, Jingang
    Springer, Charles S., Jr.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (46) : 17937 - 17942
  • [36] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer
    Turnbull, Lindsay W.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 22 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [37] Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis
    Karahaliou, A.
    Vassiou, K.
    Arikidis, N. S.
    Skiadopoulos, S.
    Kanavou, T.
    Costaridou, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (988): : 296 - 306
  • [38] Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI findings in young patients with breast cancer
    Almir G. V. Bitencourt
    Deise S. G. Eugênio
    Juliana A. Souza
    Juliana O. Souza
    Fabiana B. A. Makdissi
    Elvira F. Marques
    Rubens Chojniak
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [39] Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI findings in young patients with breast cancer
    Bitencourt, Almir G., V
    Eugenio, Deise S. G.
    Souza, Juliana A.
    Souza, Juliana O.
    Makdissi, Fabiana B. A.
    Marques, Elvira F.
    Chojniak, Rubens
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [40] DWI in the Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement on CE-MRI
    Peric, Iva
    Brkljacic, Boris
    Tadic, Tade
    Jerkovic, Kristian
    Dolic, Kresimir
    Boric, Matija
    Cavar, Marija
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (01)