Open vs Minimally Invasive Approach for Emergent Colectomy in Perforated Diverticulitis

被引:12
|
作者
Monzavi, Carlos A. Esparza [1 ]
Naffouje, Samer A. [2 ]
Chaudhry, Vivek [3 ,4 ]
Nordenstam, Johan [3 ]
Mellgren, Anders [3 ]
Gantt, Gerald, Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[4] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Diverticulitis; Hartmann procedure; Minimally invasive surgery; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; Open surgery; Primary anastomosis; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; SURGERY FOLLOWING COLECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; RISK-FACTORS; POPULATION; SWEDEN; CANCER; PROCTOCOLECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001805
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis has been managed with an open approach, with a Hartmann procedure or a colectomy with primary anastomosis. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with postoperative advantages in the elective setting and may show a benefit in the emergent setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive approaches for emergent perforated diverticulitis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database using propensity score matching. SETTINGS: Interventions were performed in hospitals participating in the national database. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent emergent colectomy from 2012 to 2017 were included. Procedures were divided into Hartmann procedure and primary anastomosis. Open vs minimally invasive groups were defined by intention to treat. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes measures included length of stay and overall morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of 130,616 patients, 7105 met inclusion criteria (4486 Hartmann procedure and 2619 primary anastomosis). A total of 1989 open Hartmann procedure cases were matched to 663 minimally invasive cases. The minimally invasive group underwent longer operations and had lower rates of respiratory failure. There were no differences in overall complications, mortality, length of stay, or home discharge. In the primary anastomosis group, 1027 cases were matched 1:1. The minimally invasive approach was associated with longer operative times, but reduced wound dehiscence, sepsis, bleeding, overall complications, and length of stay. No difference was detected in anastomotic leak, mortality, reoperation, or readmission rates. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include retrospective nature, data loss, nonuniformity, selection bias, and coding errors. CONCLUSIONS: Emergent minimally invasive primary anastomosis results in a shorter length of stay and decreased 30-day morbidity in comparison with open primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis. Emergent open and minimally invasive Hartmann procedures for perforated diverticulitis have comparable outcomes, perhaps because of a 40% conversion rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B421.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acute Colonic Diverticulitis and Cirrhosis: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy Compared with an Open Approach
    Kazi, Albert
    Finco, Tiago B.
    Zakhary, Bishoy
    Firek, Matthew
    Gerber, Ari
    Brenner, Megan
    Coimbra, Raul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 230 (06) : 1045 - 1053
  • [42] Open for Some: Healthcare Disparities in Open vs Minimally Invasive Colectomies
    Turner, Michael
    Mou, Zongyang
    Liu, Shanglei
    Ramamoorthy, Sonia L.
    Lopez, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 236 (05) : S21 - S21
  • [43] Segmental transverse colectomy. Minimally invasive versus open approach: results from a multicenter collaborative study
    Marco Milone
    Maurizio Degiuli
    Nunzio Velotti
    Michele Manigrasso
    Sara Vertaldi
    Domenico D’Ugo
    Giovanni Domenico De Palma
    Updates in Surgery, 2022, 74 : 127 - 135
  • [44] Segmental transverse colectomy. Minimally invasive versus open approach: results from a multicenter collaborative study
    Milone, Marco
    Degiuli, Maurizio
    Velotti, Nunzio
    Manigrasso, Michele
    Vertaldi, Sara
    D'Ugo, Domenico
    De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2022, 74 (01) : 127 - 135
  • [45] Post-discharge Opioid Consumption After Minimally Invasive and Open Colectomy Does Operative Approach Matter?
    Vu, Joceline
    Cleary, Robert K.
    Englesbe, Michael J.
    Brummett, Chad M.
    Waljee, Jennifer F.
    Suwanabol, Pasithorn A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (04) : 753 - 758
  • [46] Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis
    Lawrence, DM
    Pasquale, MD
    Wasser, TE
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2003, 69 (06) : 499 - 503
  • [47] Appendicitis/Diverticulitis: Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Mutter, D.
    Marescaux, J.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2013, 31 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [48] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Complicated Diverticulitis
    Valerio Celentano
    M. C. Giglio
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2017, 21 : 1373 - 1374
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Complicated Diverticulitis
    Mahmoud, Najjia N.
    Riddle, Elijah W.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (04) : 731 - 738
  • [50] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Complicated Diverticulitis
    Celentano, Valerio
    Giglio, M. C.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (08) : 1373 - 1374