Open vs Minimally Invasive Approach for Emergent Colectomy in Perforated Diverticulitis

被引:12
|
作者
Monzavi, Carlos A. Esparza [1 ]
Naffouje, Samer A. [2 ]
Chaudhry, Vivek [3 ,4 ]
Nordenstam, Johan [3 ]
Mellgren, Anders [3 ]
Gantt, Gerald, Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[4] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Diverticulitis; Hartmann procedure; Minimally invasive surgery; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; Open surgery; Primary anastomosis; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; SURGERY FOLLOWING COLECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; RISK-FACTORS; POPULATION; SWEDEN; CANCER; PROCTOCOLECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001805
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis has been managed with an open approach, with a Hartmann procedure or a colectomy with primary anastomosis. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with postoperative advantages in the elective setting and may show a benefit in the emergent setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive approaches for emergent perforated diverticulitis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database using propensity score matching. SETTINGS: Interventions were performed in hospitals participating in the national database. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent emergent colectomy from 2012 to 2017 were included. Procedures were divided into Hartmann procedure and primary anastomosis. Open vs minimally invasive groups were defined by intention to treat. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes measures included length of stay and overall morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of 130,616 patients, 7105 met inclusion criteria (4486 Hartmann procedure and 2619 primary anastomosis). A total of 1989 open Hartmann procedure cases were matched to 663 minimally invasive cases. The minimally invasive group underwent longer operations and had lower rates of respiratory failure. There were no differences in overall complications, mortality, length of stay, or home discharge. In the primary anastomosis group, 1027 cases were matched 1:1. The minimally invasive approach was associated with longer operative times, but reduced wound dehiscence, sepsis, bleeding, overall complications, and length of stay. No difference was detected in anastomotic leak, mortality, reoperation, or readmission rates. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include retrospective nature, data loss, nonuniformity, selection bias, and coding errors. CONCLUSIONS: Emergent minimally invasive primary anastomosis results in a shorter length of stay and decreased 30-day morbidity in comparison with open primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis. Emergent open and minimally invasive Hartmann procedures for perforated diverticulitis have comparable outcomes, perhaps because of a 40% conversion rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B421.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MINIMALLY INVASIVE COLECTOMY - A SIMPLIFIED NOMOGRAM TO PREDICT CONVERSION TO OPEN PROCEDURE
    Bhama, A. R.
    Aiello, A.
    Holubar, S. D.
    Kessler, H.
    Steele, S. R.
    Gorgun, E.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (05) : E97 - E97
  • [32] Duodenopancreatectomy: Open or minimally invasive approach?
    Nigri, Giuseppe
    Petrucciani, Niccolo
    La Torre, Marco
    Magistri, Paolo
    Valabrega, Stefano
    Aurello, Paolo
    Ramacciato, Giovanni
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2014, 12 (04): : 227 - 234
  • [33] Primary anastomosis vs Hartmann's procedure in patients undergoing emergency left colectomy for perforated diverticulitis
    Zingg, U.
    Pasternak, I.
    Dietrich, M.
    Seifert, B.
    Oertli, D.
    Metzger, U.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [34] IS A MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH JUSTIFIED FOR COMPLEX COLECTOMY? A NATIONWIDE COMPARISON
    Schlussel, A.
    Johnson, E.
    Maykel, J.
    Steele, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (05) : E286 - E286
  • [35] Three-trocar colectomy for perforated diverticulitis - a video vignette
    Acar, T.
    Acar, N.
    Haciyanli, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (06) : 729 - 729
  • [36] Open vs Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Metastatic Cancer
    Hockman, Lukas
    Fish, Philip
    Murray, Katie S.
    Pokala, Naveen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : E244 - E245
  • [37] Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy Reply
    Hu, Jim C.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (07): : 620 - 620
  • [38] Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Andrade, Carlos E. M. C.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Munsell, Mark
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1224 - 1230
  • [39] Minimally Invasive vs Open Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: Is There a Superior Approach? Discussion
    Kays, David
    Langham, Max
    Gaines, Barbara
    Downard, Cynthia
    Fakhry, Samir
    Harting, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 224 (04) : 423 - 424
  • [40] Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic vs Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy
    Simianu, Vlad V.
    Gaertner, Wolfgang B.
    Kuntz, Karen
    Kwaan, Mary R.
    Lowry, Ann C.
    Madoff, Robert D.
    Jensen, Christine C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : S142 - S142