Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases

被引:73
|
作者
Clauson, Kevin A.
Marsh, Wallace A.
Polen, Hyla H.
Seamon, Matthew J.
Ortiz, Blanca I.
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm W Palm Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 USA
[2] Shenandoah Univ, Bernard J Dunn Sch Pharm, Winchester, VA USA
[3] Hlth Care Dist Palm Beach Cty, Delray Beach, FL USA
[4] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm, Davie, FL USA
[5] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm Ponce, Ponce, PR USA
关键词
PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; RESOURCES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-7-7
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Online drug information databases are used to assist in enhancing clinical decision support. However, the choice of which online database to consult, purchase or subscribe to is likely made based on subjective elements such as history of use, familiarity, or availability during professional training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical decision support tools for drug information by systematically comparing the most commonly used online drug information databases. Methods: Five commercially available and two freely available online drug information databases were evaluated according to scope (presence or absence of answer), completeness (the comprehensiveness of the answers), and ease of use. Additionally, a composite score integrating all three criteria was utilized. Fifteen weighted categories comprised of 158 questions were used to conduct the analysis. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used to summarize the evaluation components and make comparisons between databases. Scheffe's multiple comparison procedure was used to determine statistically different scope and completeness scores. The composite score was subjected to sensitivity analysis to investigate the effect of the choice of percentages for scope and completeness. Results: The rankings for the databases from highest to lowest, based on composite scores were Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Lexi-Comp Online, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Epocrates Online Premium, RxList.com, and Epocrates Online Free. Differences in scope produced three statistical groupings with Group 1 (best) performers being: Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Lexi-Comp Online, Group 2: Epocrates Premium and RxList.com and Group 3: Epocrates Free (p < 0.05). Completeness scores were similarly stratified. Collapsing the databases into two groups by access (subscription or free), showed the subscription databases performed better than the free databases in the measured criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Online drug information databases, which belong to clinical decision support, vary in their ability to answer questions across a range of categories.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Data and databases for decision support
    Roberts, AM
    Moore, RV
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1998, 12 (06) : 835 - 842
  • [32] Application of information technology in clinical diabetes care - A special issue .1. Databases, algorithms and decision support
    Lehmann, ED
    MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1996, 21 (04): : 255 - 258
  • [33] ONLINE DATABASES Abundance of Information
    Tenopir, Carol
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2010, 135 (08) : 22 - 22
  • [34] Information Architecture of a Clinical Decision Support System
    Robbins, David E.
    Gurupur, Varadraj P.
    Tanik, John
    IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2011: BUILDING GLOBAL ENGINEERS, 2011, : 374 - 378
  • [35] Anesthesia information management: clinical decision support
    Freundlich, Robert E.
    Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (06) : 705 - 709
  • [36] Organizing literature information for clinical decision support
    Demner-Fushman, D
    Hauser, SE
    Ford, G
    Thoma, GR
    MEDINFO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL INFORMATICS, PT 1 AND 2, 2004, 107 : 602 - 606
  • [37] Patterns of use of handheld clinical decision support tools in the clinical setting
    Yu, Feliciano
    Houston, Thomas K.
    Bay, Midge N.
    Garner, Duriel Q.
    Berner, Eta S.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (06) : 744 - 753
  • [38] Usability of Selected Databases for Low-Resource Clinical Decision Support
    Sheets, L.
    Callaghan, F.
    Gavino, A.
    Liu, F.
    Fontelo, P.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 3 (03): : 326 - 333
  • [39] Drug-drug interaction checking assisted by clinical decision support: a return on investment analysis
    Helmons, Pieter J.
    Suijkerbuijk, Bas O.
    Panday, Prashant V. Nannan
    Kosterink, Jos G. W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 22 (04) : 764 - 772
  • [40] DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS
    MURRAY, W
    ANDREW SEYBOLDS OUTLOOK ON PROFESSIONAL COMPUTING, 1990, 8 (10): : 26 - 28