Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases

被引:73
|
作者
Clauson, Kevin A.
Marsh, Wallace A.
Polen, Hyla H.
Seamon, Matthew J.
Ortiz, Blanca I.
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm W Palm Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 USA
[2] Shenandoah Univ, Bernard J Dunn Sch Pharm, Winchester, VA USA
[3] Hlth Care Dist Palm Beach Cty, Delray Beach, FL USA
[4] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm, Davie, FL USA
[5] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm Ponce, Ponce, PR USA
关键词
PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; RESOURCES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-7-7
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Online drug information databases are used to assist in enhancing clinical decision support. However, the choice of which online database to consult, purchase or subscribe to is likely made based on subjective elements such as history of use, familiarity, or availability during professional training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical decision support tools for drug information by systematically comparing the most commonly used online drug information databases. Methods: Five commercially available and two freely available online drug information databases were evaluated according to scope (presence or absence of answer), completeness (the comprehensiveness of the answers), and ease of use. Additionally, a composite score integrating all three criteria was utilized. Fifteen weighted categories comprised of 158 questions were used to conduct the analysis. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used to summarize the evaluation components and make comparisons between databases. Scheffe's multiple comparison procedure was used to determine statistically different scope and completeness scores. The composite score was subjected to sensitivity analysis to investigate the effect of the choice of percentages for scope and completeness. Results: The rankings for the databases from highest to lowest, based on composite scores were Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Lexi-Comp Online, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Epocrates Online Premium, RxList.com, and Epocrates Online Free. Differences in scope produced three statistical groupings with Group 1 (best) performers being: Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Lexi-Comp Online, Group 2: Epocrates Premium and RxList.com and Group 3: Epocrates Free (p < 0.05). Completeness scores were similarly stratified. Collapsing the databases into two groups by access (subscription or free), showed the subscription databases performed better than the free databases in the measured criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Online drug information databases, which belong to clinical decision support, vary in their ability to answer questions across a range of categories.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] USE OF DATABASES AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN HEALTH IN COLOMBIA
    Alfonso-Cristancho, R.
    Diaz-Sotelo, O. D.
    Maestre, K.
    Quijano Arango, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A700 - A700
  • [22] Clinical decision support: From data to clinical information
    Thull, B
    Rau, G
    Hanrath, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 2162 - 2164
  • [23] Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Electronic Medical Record
    Alexiuk, Mackenzie
    Elgubtan, Heba
    Tangri, Navdeep
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2024, 9 (01): : 29 - 38
  • [24] CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS IMPROVING CANCER CARE
    Stillman, Robert C.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 34 (02) : 158 - 167
  • [25] Computational Tools to Support Analysis and Decision Making
    Pike, Thomas D.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING FOR MULTI-DOMAIN OPERATIONS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 11006
  • [26] Integrating Clinical Decision Support Tools in CKD Management
    Thiessen Philbrook, Heather
    Patel, Dipal M.
    Bitzel, Jack
    Menez, Steven
    Cervantes, C. Elena
    Jaar, Bernard G.
    Grams, Morgan
    Parikh, Chirag R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 35 (10):
  • [27] A critical perspective on the tools to support clinical decision making
    Evans, RW
    TRANSFUSION, 1996, 36 (08) : 671 - 673
  • [28] Clinical decision support tools assist nongenetics providers
    Dengler, V. L.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (04) : 591 - 591
  • [29] Analysis of an integrated clinical decision support system in nursing home clinical information systems
    Alexander, Gregory L.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2008, 34 (02): : 15 - 20
  • [30] Developing Web-Based Online Support Tools: The Dartmouth Decision Support Software
    Andrews, Steven B.
    Drake, Tyler
    Haslett, William
    Munusamy, Rajesh
    PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2010, 34 (01) : 37 - 41