Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases

被引:73
|
作者
Clauson, Kevin A.
Marsh, Wallace A.
Polen, Hyla H.
Seamon, Matthew J.
Ortiz, Blanca I.
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm W Palm Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 USA
[2] Shenandoah Univ, Bernard J Dunn Sch Pharm, Winchester, VA USA
[3] Hlth Care Dist Palm Beach Cty, Delray Beach, FL USA
[4] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm, Davie, FL USA
[5] Nova SE Univ, Coll Pharm Ponce, Ponce, PR USA
关键词
PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; RESOURCES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-7-7
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Online drug information databases are used to assist in enhancing clinical decision support. However, the choice of which online database to consult, purchase or subscribe to is likely made based on subjective elements such as history of use, familiarity, or availability during professional training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical decision support tools for drug information by systematically comparing the most commonly used online drug information databases. Methods: Five commercially available and two freely available online drug information databases were evaluated according to scope (presence or absence of answer), completeness (the comprehensiveness of the answers), and ease of use. Additionally, a composite score integrating all three criteria was utilized. Fifteen weighted categories comprised of 158 questions were used to conduct the analysis. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used to summarize the evaluation components and make comparisons between databases. Scheffe's multiple comparison procedure was used to determine statistically different scope and completeness scores. The composite score was subjected to sensitivity analysis to investigate the effect of the choice of percentages for scope and completeness. Results: The rankings for the databases from highest to lowest, based on composite scores were Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Lexi-Comp Online, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Epocrates Online Premium, RxList.com, and Epocrates Online Free. Differences in scope produced three statistical groupings with Group 1 (best) performers being: Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, Facts & Comparisons 4.0, Lexi-Comp Online, Group 2: Epocrates Premium and RxList.com and Group 3: Epocrates Free (p < 0.05). Completeness scores were similarly stratified. Collapsing the databases into two groups by access (subscription or free), showed the subscription databases performed better than the free databases in the measured criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Online drug information databases, which belong to clinical decision support, vary in their ability to answer questions across a range of categories.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases
    Kevin A Clauson
    Wallace A Marsh
    Hyla H Polen
    Matthew J Seamon
    Blanca I Ortiz
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7
  • [2] Clinical decision support tools: Performance of personal digital assistant versus online drug information databases
    Clauson, Kevin A.
    Polen, Hyla H.
    Marsh, Wallace A.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 27 (12): : 1651 - 1658
  • [3] Evaluation of nursing-specific drug information PDA databases used as clinical decision support tools
    Polen, Hyla H.
    Clauson, Kevin A.
    Thomson, Wendy
    Zapantis, Antonia
    Lou, Jennie Q.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 78 (10) : 679 - 687
  • [4] Clinical Decision Support Tools: Personal Digital Assistant versus Online Dietary Supplement Databases
    Clauson, Kevin A.
    Polen, Hyla H.
    Peak, Amy S.
    Marsh, Wallace A.
    DiScala, Sandra L.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 42 (11) : 1592 - 1599
  • [5] CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS: FOCUS ON DIETARY SUPPLEMENT DATABASES
    Clauson, Kevin A.
    Peak, Amy S.
    Marsh, Wallace A.
    DiScala, Sandra
    Bellinger, Robert R.
    ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2008, 14 (03) : 36 - 40
  • [6] Computerized Clinical Decision Support and Drug Interaction Databases
    Figge, Helen L.
    US PHARMACIST, 2012, 37 (03) : 47 - 49
  • [7] What patients think of online clinical decision support tools
    Walsh, Kieran
    BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2018, 4 (01): : 41 - 42
  • [8] Clinical Decision Support Tools
    Kosinski, Lawrence R.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (07) : 756 - 759
  • [9] Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetic Decision Support Tools for Antidepressant Drug Prescribing
    Zeier, Zane
    Carpenter, Linda L.
    Kalin, Ned H.
    Rodriguez, Carolyn I.
    McDonald, William M.
    Widge, Alik S.
    Nemeroff, Charles B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 175 (09): : 873 - 886
  • [10] Quality of drug information database research for clinical decision support
    Hoody, Dorie W.
    Beckett, Cynthia F.
    Zielenski, Christopher
    Moore, Gina D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2011, 33 (04) : 599 - 602