MISSION DESIGN AND DISPOSAL METHODS COMPARISON FOR THE REMOVAL OF MULTIPLE DEBRIS

被引:0
|
作者
Casalino, Lorenzo [1 ]
Pastrone, Dario [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2016, PTS I-IV | 2016年 / 158卷
关键词
HYBRID EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, detailed mission design for multiple debris removal is performed by selecting the most favorable sequences of the objects to be removed. Debris among a population with similar inclination values are considered. An approximate analysis, based on the use of J2 effect to minimize propellant consumption, provides accurate estimations of actual transfer times and Delta V between any debris pair in order to evaluate the costs of any possible sequence. The mass of the removal kit for any debris is evaluated, based on debris orbit and mass, and on the selected removal method. The overall mission mass budget is thus evaluated. All the possible sequences are compared by means of this fast procedure and the best opportunities in terms of mass and mission time are selected. Transfer trajectories are verified by a local search module, which evaluates rendezvous transfers between two given orbits taking J2 perturbation into account for an accurate evaluation of the mission costs. Up to four impulses are considered for the transfer between debris pairs.
引用
收藏
页码:2669 / 2681
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal planning for a multi-debris active removal mission with a partial debris capture strategy
    Jia GUO
    Zhaojun PANG
    Zhonghua DU
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, (06) : 256 - 265
  • [42] Optimal planning for a multi-debris active removal mission with a partial debris capture strategy
    Jia GUO
    Zhaojun PANG
    Zhonghua DU
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36 (06) : 256 - 265
  • [43] Assessment of active methods for removal of LEO debris
    Hakima, Houman
    Emami, M. Reza
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2018, 144 : 225 - 243
  • [44] Review of Active Space Debris Removal Methods
    Mark, C. Priyant
    Kamath, Surekha
    SPACE POLICY, 2019, 47 : 194 - 206
  • [45] Space debris hazards and removal methods - an overview
    Suseela, Gisa Geoson
    Muddu, Shyam Venkat Manne
    Achari, Sudeep Kumar
    Vinod, Spandana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPACE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 7 (01) : 32 - 79
  • [46] Flood Debris Quantification and Comparison Based on the Removal and Disposal Operation: Postdisaster Study of Beaumont, Texas Following Hurricane Harvey
    Bekkaye, Jasmine H.
    Jafari, Navid H.
    NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2023, 24 (04)
  • [47] Active debris removal of multiple priority targets
    Braun, Vitali
    Luepken, A.
    Flegel, S.
    Gelhaus, J.
    Moeckel, M.
    Kebschull, C.
    Wiedemann, C.
    Voersmann, P.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (09) : 1638 - 1648
  • [48] OPTIMAL PLAN FOR MULTIPLE DEBRIS REMOVAL MISSIONS
    Cerf, Max
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (04) : 1005 - 1032
  • [49] Operational Progress Update on the ELSA-d Debris Removal Mission
    Forshaw, J.
    Colebourn, A.
    Walker, C.
    Hutchinson, E.
    Shave, N.
    Iizuka, S.
    Seto, Y.
    Ota, Y.
    Lidtke, A.A.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    Fujii, G.
    Blackerby, C.
    Okada, N.
    Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 2022, 2022-September
  • [50] Active Debris Removal Mission Planning Method Based on Machine Learning
    Xu, Yingjie
    Liu, Xiaolu
    He, Renjie
    Zhu, Yuehe
    Zuo, Yahui
    He, Lei
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (06)