MISSION DESIGN AND DISPOSAL METHODS COMPARISON FOR THE REMOVAL OF MULTIPLE DEBRIS

被引:0
|
作者
Casalino, Lorenzo [1 ]
Pastrone, Dario [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2016, PTS I-IV | 2016年 / 158卷
关键词
HYBRID EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, detailed mission design for multiple debris removal is performed by selecting the most favorable sequences of the objects to be removed. Debris among a population with similar inclination values are considered. An approximate analysis, based on the use of J2 effect to minimize propellant consumption, provides accurate estimations of actual transfer times and Delta V between any debris pair in order to evaluate the costs of any possible sequence. The mass of the removal kit for any debris is evaluated, based on debris orbit and mass, and on the selected removal method. The overall mission mass budget is thus evaluated. All the possible sequences are compared by means of this fast procedure and the best opportunities in terms of mass and mission time are selected. Transfer trajectories are verified by a local search module, which evaluates rendezvous transfers between two given orbits taking J2 perturbation into account for an accurate evaluation of the mission costs. Up to four impulses are considered for the transfer between debris pairs.
引用
收藏
页码:2669 / 2681
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mission design and GNC for In-Orbit Demonstration of Active Debris Removal technologies with CubeSats
    Pirat, Camille
    Richard-Noca, Muriel
    Paccolat, Christophe
    Belloni, Federico
    Wiesendanger, Reto
    Courtney, Daniel
    Walker, Roger
    Gass, Volker
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 130 : 114 - 127
  • [22] Multiple Space Debris Collecting Mission: Optimal Mission Planning
    Cerf, Max
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 167 (01) : 195 - 218
  • [23] Multiple Space Debris Collecting Mission: Optimal Mission Planning
    Max Cerf
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2015, 167 : 195 - 218
  • [24] Design of multiple space debris removal missions using machine learning
    Viavattene, Giulia
    Devereux, Ellen
    Snelling, David
    Payne, Niven
    Wokes, Stephen
    Ceriotti, Matteo
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2022, 193 : 277 - 286
  • [25] Evolutionary Optimization for Active Debris Removal Mission Planning
    Zona, Danilo
    Zavoli, Alessandro
    Federici, Lorenzo
    Avanzini, Giulio
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 41019 - 41033
  • [26] Space debris active removal mission planning: A review
    Xu Y.-J.
    Liu X.-L.
    He R.-J.
    Zuo Y.-H.
    Song Y.-J.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2024, 39 (02): : 371 - 380
  • [27] On the use of A* search for active debris removal mission planning
    Federici, Lorenzo
    Zavoli, Alessandro
    Colasurdo, Guido
    JOURNAL OF SPACE SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2021, 8 (03): : 245 - 255
  • [28] Mission concept and autonomy considerations for active Debris removal
    Peters, Susanne
    Pirzkall, Christoph
    Fiedler, Hauke
    Foerstner, Roger
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 129 : 410 - 418
  • [29] Multiple Space Debris Collecting Mission—Debris Selection and Trajectory Optimization
    M. Cerf
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2013, 156 : 761 - 796
  • [30] Design-ballistic analysis of a mission for active removal of space debris from geostationary orbit
    Petukhov, V. G.
    Vnukov, A. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "ACTUAL ISSUES OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING" (AIME 2018), 2018, 157 : 485 - 489